ArticleBiomedical optics express2018
Intra-class variability in diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: application to porcine adipose tissue.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Specimen-Separated Machine Learning Benchmark Toward Real-Time Tissue-Type Identification in Guided Surgery Using Ex Vivo Bovine Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cytotoxicity analysis of oxazine 4-perchlorate fluorescence nerve potential clinical biomarker for guided surgery.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Application of Classification Algorithms to Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy Measurements for Ex Vivo Characterization of Biological Tissues.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) has great potential in the study, diagnosis, and discrimination of biological tissues. Discrimination is based on massive measurements that conform training sets. These sets are then used to classify tissues according to the biomedical application. Classification accuracy depends strongly on the training dataset, which typically comes from different samples of the same class, and from different points of the same sample. The variability of these measurements is not usually considered and is assumed to be purely random, although it could greatly influence the results. In this work, spectral variations within and between samples of different animals of ex-vivo porcine adipose tissue are evaluated. Algorithms for normalization, dimensionality reduction by principal component analysis, and variability control are applied. The PC analysis shows the dataset variability, even when a variability removal algorithm is applied. The projected data appear grouped by animal in the PC space. Mahalanobis distance is calculated for every group, and an ANOVA test is performed in order to estimate the variability. The results confirm that the variability is not random and is dependent at least on the anatomical location and the specific animal. The variability magnitude is significant, particularly if the classification accuracy is needed to be high. As a consequence, it should be taken generally into account in classification problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.