Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29760988›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2018

Intra-class variability in diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: application to porcine adipose tissue.

Félix Fanjul-Vélez, Laura Arévalo-Díaz, José L Arce-Diego

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Félix Fanjul-VélezApplied Optical Techniques Group, TEISA Department, University of Cantabria, Av. de los Castros s/n, 39005, Santander, Spain.
Laura Arévalo-DíazApplied Optical Techniques Group, TEISA Department, University of Cantabria, Av. de los Castros s/n, 39005, Santander, Spain.
José L Arce-DiegoApplied Optical Techniques Group, TEISA Department, University of Cantabria, Av. de los Castros s/n, 39005, Santander, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) has great potential in the study, diagnosis, and discrimination of biological tissues. Discrimination is based on massive measurements that conform training sets. These sets are then used to classify tissues according to the biomedical application. Classification accuracy depends strongly on the training dataset, which typically comes from different samples of the same class, and from different points of the same sample. The variability of these measurements is not usually considered and is assumed to be purely random, although it could greatly influence the results. In this work, spectral variations within and between samples of different animals of ex-vivo porcine adipose tissue are evaluated. Algorithms for normalization, dimensionality reduction by principal component analysis, and variability control are applied. The PC analysis shows the dataset variability, even when a variability removal algorithm is applied. The projected data appear grouped by animal in the PC space. Mahalanobis distance is calculated for every group, and an ANOVA test is performed in order to estimate the variability. The results confirm that the variability is not random and is dependent at least on the anatomical location and the specific animal. The variability magnitude is significant, particularly if the classification accuracy is needed to be high. As a consequence, it should be taken generally into account in classification problems.

Indexed as

(170.4580) Optical diagnostics for medicine(170.6510) Spectroscopy, tissue diagnostics(170.6935) Tissue characterization

Identifiers

PMID29760988
PMCPMC5946789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.