ArticleBiomedical optics express2018
Blood vessel detection, localization and estimation using a smart laparoscopic grasper: a Monte Carlo study.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- EndoTac: An Endoscopic Camera-Based Tactile Sensor with High Sensitivity for Minimally Invasive Surgery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Early Blood Clot Detection Using Forward Scattering Light Measurements Is Not Superior to Delta Pressure Measurements.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Noninvasive Flow Monitoring in Simple Flow Phantom Using Resistive Strain Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Method for the Detection of Tumor Blood Vessels in Neurosurgery Using a Gripping Force Feedback System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For centuries, surgeons have relied on their sense of touch to identify vital structures such as blood vessels in traditional open surgery. Over the past two decades, surgeons have shifted to minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches, including laparoscopic surgery, which include benefits such as less scarring, less risk for infection, and quicker recovery times. In fact, some surgeries such as cholecystectomies have seen more than an 80% adoption of this technique because of those benefits. However, due to the fundamental challenges associated with using laparoscopic surgery, there has been a lower adoption in more complex specialties, such as colorectal and thoracic surgery, where the field of surgery has bleeding, fat, scar tissue, and adhesions. These problems are exacerbated by complicating factors such as inflammation, cancer, chronic disease, obesity, and re-operations. Importantly, surgeons will often convert from laparoscopy to open surgery if they can no longer proceed using the minimally invasive approach because of issues described with these complicating factors, thereby negating the benefits that the patient would have seen. When the surgeon does attempt these procedures with those issues, the surgery takes on average 30 min - 1 hour longer. A new method by which surgeons can visualize structures like blood vessels could reduce the conversion rates and operating time, thereby driving a greater adoption of laparoscopic surgery in these complex procedures. Here, we show that by adding near infrared (NIR) LEDs and a linear image sensor onto the opposing jaws of the laparoscopic graspers, blood vessels that are embedded within tissues can be detected and localized efficiently, even those not visible using current imaging techniques. We show the results of Monte Carlo simulations to support our claim, including that blood vessels ranging from 2 to 6 mm and buried under up to 1 cm of tissue can be detected. We also report developing a smart grasper handheld prototype to run
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.