Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29760780›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2018

Derivative chromosomes involving 5p large rearranged segments went unnoticed with the use of conventional cytogenetics.

Emiy Yokoyama, Victoria Del Castillo, Silvia Sánchez, Sandra Ramos, Bertha Molina, Leda Torres, María José Navarro, Silvia Avila, José Luis Castrillo, Benilde García-De Teresa and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Emiy Yokoyama1Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Victoria Del Castillo1Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Silvia Sánchez2Laboratorio de Citogenética, Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Sandra Ramos2Laboratorio de Citogenética, Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Bertha Molina2Laboratorio de Citogenética, Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Leda Torres2Laboratorio de Citogenética, Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
María José Navarro1Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Silvia AvilaLaboratorio GENETADI, Bilbao, Spain.
José Luis CastrilloLaboratorio GENETADI, Bilbao, Spain.
Benilde García-De Teresa2Laboratorio de Citogenética, Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Bárbara AschLaboratorio Diagen, Hospital ABC Santa Fe, Cuidad de México, México.
Sara Frías2Laboratorio de Citogenética, Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-6368
Centro de Epilepsia y Neurocirugía Funcional · GTCentro Médico ABC · MXInstituto Nacional de Pediatria · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn countries where comparative genomic hybridization arrays (aCGH) and next generation sequencing are not widely available due to accessibility and economic constraints, conventional 400-500-band karyotyping is the first-line choice for the etiological diagnosis of patients with congenital malformations and intellectual disability. Conventional karyotype analysis can rule out chromosomal alterations greater than 10 Mb. However, some large structural abnormalities, such as derivative chromosomes, may go undetected when the analysis is performed at less than a 550-band resolution and the size and banding pattern of the interchanged segments are similar. Derivatives frequently originate from inter-chromosomal exchanges and sometimes are inherited from a parent who carries a reciprocal translocation. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two cases with derivative chromosomes involving a 9.1 Mb 5p deletion/14.8 Mb 10p duplication in the first patient and a 19.9 Mb 5p deletion/ 18.5 Mb 9p duplication in the second patient. These long chromosomal imbalances were ascertained by aCGH but not by conventional cytogenetics. Both patients presented with a deletion of the Cri du chat syndrome region and a duplication of another genomic region. Each patient had a unique clinical picture, and although they presented some features of Cri du chat syndrome, the phenotype did not conclusively point towards this diagnosis, although a chromosomopathy was suspected.

conclusionsThese cases highlight the fundamental role of the clinical suspicion in guiding the approach for the etiological diagnosis of patients. Molecular cytogenetics techniques, such as aCGH, should be considered when the clinician suspects the presence of a chromosomal imbalance in spite of a normal karyotype.

Indexed as

10p15 duplication5p deletion9p22 duplicationCongenital malformationsDerivate chromosomesIntellectual disabilityTranslocations

Identifiers

PMID29760780
PMCPMC5941813
OpenAlexW2806269944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.