Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29760765›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2018

An improved method for

Tania Ho-Plágaro, Raúl Huertas, María I Tamayo-Navarrete, Juan A Ocampo, José M García-Garrido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. TheFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Exploring the potential role of fourFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  13. Characterization of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Effector Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. RhizogenicProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tania Ho-Plágaro1Department of Soil Microbiology and Symbiotic Systems, Estación Experimental del Zaidín (EEZ), CSIC, Calle Profesor Albareda n◦1, 18008 Granada, Spain.
Raúl Huertas2Noble Research Institute LLC, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway, Ardmore, OK 73401 USA.
María I Tamayo-Navarrete1Department of Soil Microbiology and Symbiotic Systems, Estación Experimental del Zaidín (EEZ), CSIC, Calle Profesor Albareda n◦1, 18008 Granada, Spain.
Juan A Ocampo1Department of Soil Microbiology and Symbiotic Systems, Estación Experimental del Zaidín (EEZ), CSIC, Calle Profesor Albareda n◦1, 18008 Granada, Spain.
José M García-Garrido1Department of Soil Microbiology and Symbiotic Systems, Estación Experimental del Zaidín (EEZ), CSIC, Calle Profesor Albareda n◦1, 18008 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9420-8926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

resultsWe have developed an optimized procedure for composite tomato plant obtaining achieved through

conclusionsIn this study, we present an easy, fast and low-cost procedure to study AM symbiosis in tomato roots.

Indexed as

Arbuscular mycorrhizaComposite plantsHairy rootsTomatoTransformation

Identifiers

PMID29760765
PMCPMC5941616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.