Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29760691›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018

Extracellular Vesicle Heterogeneity: Subpopulations, Isolation Techniques, and Diverse Functions in Cancer Progression.

Eduard Willms, Carlos Cabañas, Imre Mäger, Matthew J A Wood, Pieter Vader

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 591 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
591citing papers in PubMed
29.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

591 citing papers in PubMed, 972 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Platelet subpopulations and contribution to hemostasis.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

531 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Eduard WillmsDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Carlos CabañasCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Imre MägerDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matthew J A WoodDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Pieter VaderDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa · ESUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 1530868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells release membrane enclosed nano-sized vesicles termed extracellular vesicles (EVs) that function as mediators of intercellular communication by transferring biological information between cells. Tumor-derived EVs have emerged as important mediators in cancer development and progression, mainly through transfer of their bioactive content which can include oncoproteins, oncogenes, chemokine receptors, as well as soluble factors, transcripts of proteins and miRNAs involved in angiogenesis or inflammation. This transfer has been shown to influence the metastatic behavior of primary tumors. Moreover, tumor-derived EVs have been shown to influence distant cellular niches, establishing favorable microenvironments that support growth of disseminated cancer cells upon their arrival at these pre-metastatic niches. It is generally accepted that cells release a number of major EV populations with distinct biophysical properties and biological functions. Exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies are EV populations most widely studied and characterized. They are discriminated based primarily on their intracellular origin. However, increasing evidence suggests that even within these EV populations various subpopulations may exist. This heterogeneity introduces an extra level of complexity in the study of EV biology and function. For example, EV subpopulations could have unique roles in the intricate biological processes underlying cancer biology. Here, we discuss current knowledge regarding the role of subpopulations of EVs in cancer development and progression and highlight the relevance of EV heterogeneity. The position of tetraspanins and integrins therein will be highlighted. Since addressing EV heterogeneity has become essential for the EV field, current and novel techniques for isolating EV subpopulations will also be discussed. Further dissection of EV heterogeneity will advance our understanding of the critical roles of EVs in health and disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ProgressionExtracellular VesiclesHumansNeoplasmscancerexosomesextracellular vesiclesheterogeneitymicrovesiclessubpopulations

Identifiers

PMID29760691
PMCPMC5936763
OpenAlexW2801497388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.