Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29760670›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Validating the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II) Using Set-ESEM: Identifying Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Sample of School Principals.

Theresa Dicke, Herbert W Marsh, Philip Riley, Philip D Parker, Jiesi Guo, Marcus Horwood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
90.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 266 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. School principals' proposals for preventive actions to improve mental health.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Theresa DickeInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Herbert W MarshDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Philip RileyInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Philip D ParkerInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jiesi GuoInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marcus HorwoodInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Australian Catholic University · AUUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School principals world-wide report high levels of strain and attrition resulting in a shortage of qualified principals. It is thus crucial to identify psychosocial risk factors that reflect principals' occupational wellbeing. For this purpose, we used the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II), a widely used self-report measure covering multiple psychosocial factors identified by leading occupational stress theories. We evaluated the COPSOQ-II regarding factor structure and longitudinal, discriminant, and convergent validity using latent structural equation modeling in a large sample of Australian school principals (

Indexed as

burnoutCOPSOQ-IIESEMoccupational wellbeingpsychometricspsychosocial risk factorsschool principals

Identifiers

PMID29760670
PMCPMC5936966
OpenAlexW2797960792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.