Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29760547›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2018

Comparison of the effects of deferasirox, deferoxamine, and combination of deferasirox and deferoxamine on an aplastic anemia mouse model complicated with iron overload.

Dijiong Wu, Xiaowen Wen, Wenbin Liu, Huijin Hu, Baodong Ye, Yuhong Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dijiong WuDepartment of Hematology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Xiaowen WenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Central Hospital of Jinhua Affiliated to Zhejiang University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Wenbin LiuDepartment of Hematology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Huijin HuDepartment of Hematology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Baodong YeDepartment of Hematology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Yuhong ZhouDepartment of Hematology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNZhejiang Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimIron overload is commonly observed during the course of aplastic anemia (AA), which is believed to aggravate hematopoiesis, cause multiple organ dysfunction, lead to disease progression, and impair quality of life. Deferasirox (DFX) and deferoxamine (DFO) are among the most common iron chelation agents available in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to investigate if the combination therapy with DFX and DFO is superior in hematopoietic recovery and iron chelation.

methodsBriefly, we developed a composite mouse model with AA and iron overload that was consequently treated with DFX, DFO, or with a combination of both agents. The changes in peripheral hemogram, marrow apoptosis, and its related protein expressions were compared during the process of iron chelation, while the iron depositions in liver and bone marrow and its regulator were also detected.

resultsThe obtained results showed that compared to DFX, DFO has a better effect in protecting the bone marrow from apoptosis-induced failure. The combination of DFO and DFX accelerated the chelation of iron, while their efficiency on further hemogram improvement appeared limited.

conclusionTo sum up, our data suggest that single treatment with DFO may be a better choice for improving the hematopoiesis during the gradual chelation treatment irrespective of the convenience of oral DFX, while the combination treatment should be considered for urgent reduction of the iron burden.

Indexed as

Anemia, AplasticAnimalsBenzoatesDeferasiroxDeferoxamineDisease Models, AnimalDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleIron Chelating AgentsIron OverloadMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred DBATriazolesBenzoatesDeferasiroxDeferoxamineIron Chelating AgentsTriazolesanimal modelaplastic anemiadeferasiroxdeferoxamineiron overloadmouse

Identifiers

PMID29760547
PMCPMC5937503
OpenAlexW2800603376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.