Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29760210›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2018

The State of the Union Is Strong: a Review of ASM's 6th Conference on Cell-Cell Communication in Bacteria.

Sam P Brown, Helen E Blackwell, Brian K Hammer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sam P BrownSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Helen E BlackwellDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Brian K HammerSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA brian.hammer@biosci.gatech.edu.

Funding

Synthetic Ligands for Modulating Bacterial CommunicationR01GM109403 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BLACKWELL, HELEN E. · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
Materials that Block Quorum Sensing and Attenuate Bacterial Infection in Skin WoundsR21AI135745 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BLACKWELL, HELEN E. · 2018 to 2019
$408k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI135745NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 6th American Society for Microbiology Conference on Cell-Cell Communication in Bacteria convened from 16 to 19 October 2017 in Athens, GA. In this minireview, we highlight some of the research presented at that meeting that addresses central questions emerging in the field, including the following questions. How are cell-cell communication circuits designed to generate responses? Where are bacteria communicating? Finally, why are bacteria engaging in such behaviors?

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaSocieties, ScientificBacteriaMicrobiologyQuorum Sensingbacteriacell-cell interactioncell signalingevolutionquorum sensingsignal transductiontherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID29760210
PMCPMC6018360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.