Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29760119›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2018

Spring-summer net community production, new production, particle export and related water column biogeochemical processes in the marginal sea ice zone of the Western Antarctic Peninsula 2012-2014.

Hugh W Ducklow, Michael R Stukel, Rachel Eveleth, Scott C Doney, Tim Jickells, Oscar Schofield, Alex R Baker, John Brindle, Rosie Chance, Nicolas Cassar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The marine system of the West Antarctic Peninsula: status and strategy for progress.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hugh W DucklowLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA hducklow@ldeo.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9480-2183
Michael R StukelLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA.
Rachel EvelethNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Scott C DoneyDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Tim JickellsSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Oscar SchofieldDepartment of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2359-4131
Alex R BakerSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
John BrindleSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Rosie ChanceSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Nicolas CassarNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New production (New P, the rate of net primary production (NPP) supported by exogenously supplied limiting nutrients) and net community production (NCP, gross primary production not consumed by community respiration) are closely related but mechanistically distinct processes. They set the carbon balance in the upper ocean and define an upper limit for export from the system. The relationships, relative magnitudes and variability of New P (from

Indexed as

Antarcticacarbon exportnet community productionocean biogeochemistrythorium-234 deficiency

Identifiers

PMID29760119
PMCPMC5954475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.