Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29760095›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Volatile biomarkers of symptomatic and asymptomatic malaria infection in humans.

Consuelo M De Moraes, Caroline Wanjiku, Nina M Stanczyk, Hannier Pulido, James W Sims, Heike S Betz, Andrew F Read, Baldwyn Torto, Mark C Mescher

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. No skin off your back: the sampling and extraction of sebum for metabolomics.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Consuelo M De MoraesDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6737-9842
Caroline WanjikuBehavioural and Chemical Ecology Unit, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nina M StanczykDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Hannier PulidoDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
James W SimsDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3472-1642
Heike S BetzDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Andrew F ReadDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0001-7604-7903
Baldwyn TortoBehavioural and Chemical Ecology Unit, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-5080-9903
Mark C MescherDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; mescher@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-7908-3309
ETH Zurich · CHInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KEPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria remains among the world's deadliest diseases, and control efforts depend critically on the availability of effective diagnostic tools, particularly for the identification of asymptomatic infections, which play a key role in disease persistence and may account for most instances of transmission but often evade detection by current screening methods. Research on humans and in animal models has shown that infection by malaria parasites elicits changes in host odors that influence vector attraction, suggesting that such changes might yield robust biomarkers of infection status. Here we present findings based on extensive collections of skin volatiles from human populations with high rates of malaria infection in Kenya. We report broad and consistent effects of malaria infection on human volatile profiles, as well as significant divergence in the effects of symptomatic and asymptomatic infections. Furthermore, predictive models based on machine learning algorithms reliably determined infection status based on volatile biomarkers. Critically, our models identified asymptomatic infections with 100% sensitivity, even in the case of low-level infections not detectable by microscopy, far exceeding the performance of currently available rapid diagnostic tests in this regard. We also identified a set of individual compounds that emerged as consistently important predictors of infection status. These findings suggest that volatile biomarkers may have significant potential for the development of a robust, noninvasive screening method for detecting malaria infections under field conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersChildDiscriminant AnalysisHumansKenyaMachine LearningMalariaModels, StatisticalPredictive Value of TestsSkinVolatile Organic CompoundsBiomarkersVolatile Organic Compoundsasymptomatic infectiondiagnosticsdisease biomarkersmalariavolatiles

Identifiers

PMID29760095
PMCPMC5984526
OpenAlexW2801696608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.