Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29760027›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of family medicine2018

Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services: A Mixed Methods Study.

Catherine Hudon, Maud-Christine Chouinard, Marie-France Dubois, Pasquale Roberge, Christine Loignon, Éric Tchouaket, Mireille Lambert, Émilie Hudon, Fatoumata Diadiou, Danielle Bouliane

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of family medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Nurses' and Patients' Perspectives on Care Coordination Across Health Care and Social Services Sectors: A Qualitative Study.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Catherine HudonDépartement de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada Catherine.Hudon@usherbrooke.ca.
Maud-Christine ChouinardCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, Canada.
Marie-France DuboisDépartement des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Pasquale RobergeDépartement de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Christine LoignonDépartement de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Éric TchouaketDépartement des sciences infirmières, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Québec, Canada.
Mireille LambertCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, Canada.
Émilie HudonCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, Canada.
Fatoumata DiadiouCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, Canada.
Danielle BoulianeCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of the V1SAGES case management intervention (Vulnerable Patients in Primary Care: Nurse Case Management and Self-management Support) for frequent users of health care services with chronic disease and complex care needs on psychological distress and patient activation.

methodsWe used a 2-phase sequential mixed methods design. The first phase was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis that measured the effects of the intervention compared with usual care on psychological distress and patient activation before and after 6 months. The second phase had a qualitative descriptive design and entailed thematic analysis of in-depth interviews (25 patients, 6 case management nurses, 9 health managers) and focus groups (8 patients' spouses, 21 family physicians) to understand stakeholders' perceived effects of the intervention on patients.

resultsA total of 247 patients were randomized into the intervention group (n = 126) or the control group (n = 121). Compared with usual care, the intervention reduced psychological distress (odds ratio = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19-0.95,

conclusionsTogether, our study's quantitative and qualitative results suggest that case management reduces psychological distress, making patients and caregivers feel more secure, whereas impact on self-management is unclear. Case management is a promising avenue to improve outcomes among frequent users of health care with complex needs.

Indexed as

Case ManagementAgedCanadaCaregiversChronic DiseaseFemaleFocus GroupsHealth ServicesHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchSelf Carecase managementcomorbidityfrequent usersmixed methodsoutcomespractice-based researchprimary careutilization

Identifiers

PMID29760027
PMCPMC5951252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.