ArticleVaccine2018
Impact of a clinical interventions bundle on uptake of HPV vaccine at an OB/GYN clinic.
Article in Vaccine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Pooled it
- Social Context Considerations for Future HIV Vaccine Introduction and Implementation.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Development and Evaluation of an HPV Vaccine Champion Training: a Strategy to Boost Adolescent Vaccination in Community Health Centers in Florida.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Review
- Evaluation of an HPV vaccine toolkit to improve OB/GYN discussion of HPV vaccination.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Barriers to cervical cancer prevention in a safety net clinic: gaps in HPV vaccine provider recommendation and series completion among Ob/Gyn patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Parent-reported Barriers and Parental Beliefs Associated with Intentions to Obtain HPV Vaccination for Children in a Primary care Patient Population in Minnesota, USA.Journal of community health · 2023Article
- HPV Vaccination Initiation and Completion Among Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors and a Comparison Population Sample Receiving Primary Care.Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology · 2023Article
- Feasibility of Instituting a Clinical Otolaryngology Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Program.The Laryngoscope · 2023Article
- Overcoming Vaccine Hesitancy for Future COVID-19 and HIV Vaccines: Lessons from Measles and HPV Vaccines.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2022Review
- Gynecologic oncology HPV vaccination practice patterns: Investigating practice barriers, knowledge gaps and opportunities for maximizing cervical cancer prevention.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2022Review
- Missed opportunities for concomitant HPV vaccination among childhood cancer survivors.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Evaluation of an Inpatient Postpartum Human Papillomavirus Immunization Program.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
- Association of State Legislation of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination with Vaccine Uptake Among Adolescents in the United States.Journal of community health · 2020Article
- Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Latina Mothers of South American and Caribbean Descent in the Eastern US.Health equity · 2019Article
- Inpatient Immunization With HPV Vaccine: A Qualitative Study With Postpartum Women.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHPV vaccine uptake is lowest among young adults. Little is known about the most effective way to decrease missed opportunities (MO) and increase uptake of the vaccine in this vulnerable population.
objectivesTo determine the impact of a clinical intervention bundle on the rate of MO and uptake of the vaccine among young adult women.
methodsFrom 2/2014 to 7/2015, an intervention bundle (designating physician and nurse champions, pre-screening patients' charts, empowering nurses to recommend immunization, providing no-cost vaccinations, placing prompts in clinic note templates, eliminating requirement for pre-vaccination pregnancy test) was implemented at an urban, hospital-based OB/GYN clinic. Medical records were reviewed for all vaccine-eligible (non-pregnant, 11-26 years) women seen between 2/2013 and 9/2016. Impact of the bundled interventions on the monthly rates of MO and vaccine uptake was estimated by analyzing immunization trends with an interrupted time-series model using counterfactual comparison groups in order to control for pre-existing trends.
resultsThere were 6,463 vaccine-eligible visits during our study period. The prevalence of women who had both completed and initiated the series was significantly higher, 20.3% and 29.7% respectively, in the last month, compared to their counterfactuals (p < 0.01). In the last study month, the rate of MO was significantly lower than its counterfactual (19.73 per 100 encounters lower, p < 0.01). Hispanic women had attributable reductions in their rates of MO that were twice that of White women. Statistically significant attributable reductions were also seen among Spanish speakers, publicly insured, and uninsured women.
conclusionsImplementation of this intervention bundle effectively reduced the monthly rate of MO and increased the prevalence of women who had initiated and completed the HPV vaccine series. The reduction of MO was most drastic among Hispanic, publicly insured and uninsured women compared to White and privately insured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.