Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29759149›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hematology2018

Functional Imaging Methods for Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Current Status and Novel ImmunoPET Based Methods.

Neeta Pandit-Taskar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hematology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Multiple Myeloma in 2023 Ways: From Trials to Real Life.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  4. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Minimal Residual Disease in Myeloma: Application for Clinical Care and New Drug Registration.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. MRD Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: Progress and Challenges.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neeta Pandit-TaskarDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. Electronic address: pandit-n@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging plays a key role in assessment of myeloma. Osteolytic bone lesions are optimally assessed using structural imaging, however the structural changes lag the functional changes in the disease. Functional imaging with fluoro deoxy glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) computerized tomography (CT) is useful in assessment of high-risk myeloma. FDG PET provides prognostic information and is helpful in monitoring response to therapy. However, it is nonspecific and may not be optimal in assessing treatment response to immunotherapeutic agents. Imaging with targeted agents may allow for better assessment of changes from therapy, that is based on the specific targeted mechanism. ImmunoPET imaging is a novel method to assess targeting of specific antigen by therapeutic antibodies. This review summarizes the role of functional imaging and development of novel immunoPET agents for assessment of treatment response and residual disease.

Indexed as

HumansMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm, ResidualPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosis(89)ZrDaratumumabFDGImmunoPETMyelomaPentixafor

Identifiers

PMID29759149
PMCPMC7549432
OpenAlexW2793920157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.