Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29759070›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

Identifying frailty in primary care: a qualitative description of family physicians' gestalt impressions of their older adult patients.

Clara Korenvain, Ida-Maisie Famiyeh, Sheila Dunn, Cynthia R Whitehead, Paula A Rochon, Lisa M McCarthy

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clara KorenvainWomen's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ida-Maisie FamiyehWomen's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sheila DunnWomen's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cynthia R WhiteheadWomen's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Paula A RochonWomen's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lisa M McCarthyWomen's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, Canada. lisa.mccarthy@utoronto.ca.

Funding

CIHR 126214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany tools exist to guide family physicians' impressions about frailty status of older adults, but no single tool, instrument, or set of criteria has emerged as most useful. The role of physicians' subjective impressions in frailty decisions has not been studied. This study explores how family physicians conceptualize frailty, and the factors that they consider when making subjective decisions about patients' frailty statuses.

methodsDescriptive qualitative study of family physicians who practice in a large urban academic family medicine center as they participated in one-on-one "think-aloud" interviews about the frailty status of their patients aged 80 years and over. Of 23 eligible family physicians, 18 shared their impressions about the frailty status of their older adult patients and the factors influencing their decisions. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.

resultsFour themes were identified, the first of which described how physicians conceptualized frailty as a spectrum and dynamic in nature, but also struggled to conceptualize it without a formal definition in place. The remaining three themes described factors considered before determining patients' frailty statuses: physical characteristics (age, weight, medical conditions), functional characteristics (physical, cognitive, social) and living conditions (level of independence, availability of supports, physical environment).

conclusionsFamily physicians viewed frailty as multifactorial, dynamic, and inclusive of functional and environmental factors. This conceptualization can be useful to make comprehensive and flexible evaluations of frailty status in conjunction with more objective frailty tools.

Indexed as

Physicians, FamilyAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHumansMalePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchFamily physiciansFrailtyOlder adultsPrimary careQualitative

Identifiers

PMID29759070
PMCPMC5952517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.