ArticleHealth promotion practice2019
Using the Replicating Effective Programs Framework to Adapt a Heart Health Intervention.
Article in Health promotion practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Recruitment Strategies for Engaging Older Minority Adults: Results From Take Heart.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020Trial
- Rationale and design of the A-STAC study: A multi-stage, hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to prevent and reduce racial disparities in postpartum hypertension.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- A Community-Engaged Process for Adapting a Cardiovascular Health Intervention for Persons with Serious Mental Illness.Ethnicity & disease · 2023Article
- Heart Disease Self-management for African American Older Adults: Outcomes of an Adapted Evidence-Based Intervention.Innovation in aging · 2022Article
- Outcomes associated with scale-up of the Stepping On falls prevention program: A case study in redesigning for dissemination.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions.Implementation science : IS · 2019Article
- Strategies for dissemination of ED/hospital elder mistreatment response team model.Journal of elder abuse & neglectArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. African Americans and people of low socioeconomic status suffer disproportionately from heart disease-related morbidity and mortality. In Detroit, Michigan, a primarily African American and low-income urban area, heart disease mortality is at twice the national rate. Despite evidence for the effectiveness of self-management support interventions in reducing chronic disease burden for older adults, few are adapted for communities most in need. This article describes the process of adapting Take PRIDE, an evidence-based heart disease self-management intervention, for older adults in Detroit via the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) framework. Working within a community-academic partnership, we found REP useful in facilitating the identification of diverse stakeholders, core versus adaptable elements of the intervention and barriers to implementation. We also made several modifications to the REP framework in order to better fit our project needs. Overall, we found REP to be an effective, flexible tool that allowed us to successfully adapt a disease-management intervention for this setting. Processes, lessons learned, and recommendations offered in this article may help researchers and practitioners working to expand access to self-management support for populations most affected by chronic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.