Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29758954›Full record

ReviewRestorative neurology and neuroscience2018

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Trisha M Kesar, James W Stinear, Steven L Wolf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Restorative neurology and neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Corticospinal Responses Following Gait-Specific Training in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Combining transcranial direct current stimulation with aerobic exercise to optimize cortical priming in stroke.Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme · 2021
    Trial
  11. Motor evoked potentials as markers of internal capsule current spread during deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Trisha M KesarDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
James W StinearExercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Steven L WolfDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · USUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Techniques DevelopmentP2CHD086844 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI THOMPSON, AIKO · 2015 to 2024
$12.7M
Telerehabilitation for Patients with StrokeU01NS091951 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CRAMER, STEVEN C. · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
NINDS Stroke Trials Network - Regional Coordinating Stroke Centers (U10)U10NS086607 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FRANKEL, MICHAEL ROSS · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Cortical and spinal correlates of stroke gait rehabilitationK01HD079584 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KESAR, TRISHA · 2014 to 2018
$632k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD079584NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD086844NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS091951NINDS NIH HHS U10 NS086607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroplasticity is a fundamental yet relatively unexplored process that can impact rehabilitation of lower extremity (LE) movements. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has gained widespread application as a non-invasive brain stimulation technique for evaluating neuroplasticity of the corticospinal pathway. However, a majority of TMS studies have been performed on hand muscles, with a paucity of TMS investigations focused on LE muscles. This perspective review paper proposes that there are unique methodological challenges associated with using TMS to evaluate corticospinal excitability of lower limb muscles. The challenges include: (1) the deeper location of the LE motor homunculus; (2) difficulty with targeting individual LE muscles during TMS; and (3) differences in corticospinal circuity controlling upper and lower limb muscles. We encourage future investigations that modify traditional methodological approaches to help address these challenges. Systematic TMS investigations are needed to determine the extent of overlap in corticomotor maps for different LE muscles. A simple, yet informative methodological solution involves simultaneous recordings from multiple LE muscles, which will provide the added benefit of observing how other relevant muscles co-vary in their responses during targeted TMS assessment directed toward a specific muscle. Furthermore, conventionally used TMS methods (e.g., determination of hot spot location and motor threshold) may need to be modified for TMS studies involving LE muscles. Additional investigations are necessary to determine the influence of testing posture as well as activation state of adjacent and distant LE muscles on TMS-elicited responses. An understanding of these challenges and solutions specific to LE TMS will improve the ability of neurorehabilitation clinicians to interpret TMS literature, and forge novel future directions for neuroscience research focused on elucidating neuroplasticity processes underlying locomotion and gait training.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationAnimalsEvoked Potentials, MotorHandHumansLower ExtremityMotor CortexNeuronal Plasticitygaithomunculusleg musclesmotor cortexNeuroplasticitynon-invasive brain stimulationposture

Identifiers

PMID29758954
PMCPMC6106786
OpenAlexW2802137293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.