Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29758563›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2018

Pilot study of population-based newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in New York state.

Jennifer N Kraszewski, Denise M Kay, Colleen F Stevens, Carrie Koval, Bianca Haser, Veronica Ortiz, Anthony Albertorio, Lilian L Cohen, Ritu Jain, Sarah P Andrew and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Validation on the First-Tier Fully Automated High-ThroughputInternational journal of neonatal screening · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jennifer N KraszewskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Denise M KayDivision of Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
Colleen F StevensDivision of Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
Carrie KovalDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Bianca HaserDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Veronica OrtizDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Anthony AlbertorioDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Lilian L CohenDepartment of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Ritu JainDivision of Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
Sarah P AndrewDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Sally Dunaway YoungDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Nicole M LaMarcaDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Darryl C De VivoDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Michele CagganaDivision of Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
Wendy K ChungDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeTo determine feasibility and utility of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in New York State.MethodsWe validated a multiplex TaqMan real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay using dried blood spots for SMA. From January 2016 to January 2017, we offered, consented, and screened 3,826 newborns at three hospitals in New York City and tested newborns for the deletion in exon 7 of SMN1.ResultsNinety-three percent of parents opted in for SMA screening. Overall the SMA carrier frequency was 1.5%. We identified one newborn with a homozygous SMN1 deletion and two copies of SMN2, which strongly suggests the severe type 1 SMA phenotype. The infant was enrolled in the NURTURE clinical trial and was first treated with Spinraza at age 15 days. She is now age 12 months, meeting all developmental milestones, and free of any respiratory issues.ConclusionOur pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of population-based screening, the acceptance by families, and the benefit of newborn screening for SMA. We suggest that SMA be considered for addition to the national recommended uniform screening panel.

Indexed as

ExonsFemaleGene DeletionGene DosageHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMuscular Atrophy, SpinalNeonatal ScreeningNew YorkPilot ProjectsSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSMN1 protein, humanSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID29758563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.