Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29758385›Full record

ArticleNeuropharmacology2018

Evaluation of reinforcing and aversive effects of voluntary Δ

Daniel G Barrus, Timothy W Lefever, Jenny L Wiley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Orally consumed cannabinoids provide long-lasting relief of allodynia in a mouse model of chronic neuropathic pain.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular Mechanism and Cannabinoid Pharmacology.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Self-administration of edible ΔDrug and alcohol dependence · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel G BarrusRTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Timothy W LefeverRTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Jenny L WileyRTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: jwiley@rti.org.
RTI International · US

Funding

THC RECEPTORSR01DA003672 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WILEY, JENNY L. · 1985 to 2018
$4.9M
Sex Differences in Cannabinoid Dependence and Analgesia (parent grant)R01DA016644 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WILEY, JENNY L. · 2004 to 2016
$3.9M
THC RECEPTORSR37DA003672 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, BILLY R · 1997 to 2006
$2.8M
Comparative Pharmacology of Cannabinoids in Rodent ModelsR01DA045003 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI MARUSICH, JULIE A · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003672NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016644NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045003NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA003672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Edible cannabis-infused products are an increasingly popular method of using cannabis in the United States. Yet, preclinical research to determine mechanisms underlying abuse of Δ

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdministration, OralAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDronabinolDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFeeding BehaviorFemaleMalePsychotropic DrugsRandom AllocationRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationVolitionDronabinolPsychotropic DrugsCannabinoidDelta-9-tetrahydrocannabinolOralSelf-administrationTaste preference

Identifiers

PMID29758385
PMCPMC6278827
OpenAlexW2801968063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.