Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29758071›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The long-term impact of community mobilisation through participatory women's groups on women's agency in the household: A follow-up study to the Makwanpur trial.

Lu Gram, Jolene Skordis-Worrall, Dharma S Manandhar, Daniel Strachan, Joanna Morrison, Naomi Saville, David Osrin, Kirti M Tumbahangphe, Anthony Costello, Michelle Heys

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lu GramInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3905-0465
Jolene Skordis-WorrallInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dharma S ManandharMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Daniel StrachanInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joanna MorrisonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Naomi SavilleInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
David OsrinInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kirti M TumbahangpheMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anthony CostelloInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michelle HeysInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBMother and Infant Research Activities · NPGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council G81174HWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 085417/Z/08/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women's groups practicing participatory learning and action (PLA) in rural areas have been shown to improve maternal and newborn survival in low-income countries, but the pathways from intervention to impact remain unclear. We assessed the long-term impact of a PLA intervention in rural Nepal on women's agency in the household. In 2014, we conducted a follow-up study to a cluster randomised controlled trial on the impact of PLA women's groups from 2001-2003. Agency was measured using the Relative Autonomy Index (RAI) and its subdomains. Multi-level regression analyses were performed adjusting for baseline socio-demographic characteristics. We additionally adjusted for potential exposure to subsequent PLA groups based on women's pregnancy status and conduct of PLA groups in areas of residence. Sensitivity analyses were performed using two alternative measures of agency. We analysed outcomes for 4030 mothers (66% of the cohort) who survived and were recruited to follow-up at mean age 39.6 years. Across a wide range of model specifications, we found no association between exposure to the original PLA intervention with women's agency in the household approximately 11.5 years later. Subsequent exposure to PLA groups was not associated with greater agency in the household at follow-up, but some specifications found evidence for reduced agency. Household agency may be a prerequisite for actualising the benefits of PLA groups rather than a consequence.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationFamily CharacteristicsAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansModels, TheoreticalNepalTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29758071
PMCPMC5951552
OpenAlexW2801894459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.