ArticleMolecular microbiology2018
Reading of the non-template DNA by transcription elongation factors.
Article in Molecular microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The structure and activities of the archaeal transcription termination factor Eta detail vulnerabilities of the transcription elongation complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Unlike transcription initiation and termination, which have easily discernable signals, such as promoters and terminators, elongation is regulated through a dynamic network involving RNA/DNA pause signals and states-rather than sequence-specific protein interactions. A report by Nedialkov et al. () provides experimental evidence for sequence-specific recruitment of elongation factor RfaH to transcribing RNA polymerase (RNAP) and outlines the mechanism of gene expression regulation by restraint ('locking') of the DNA non-template strand. According to this model, the elongation complex pauses at the so called 'operon polarity sequence' (found in some long bacterial operons coding for virulence genes), when the usually flexible non-template DNA strand adopts a distinct hairpin-loop conformation on the surface of transcribing RNAP. Sequence-specific binding of RfaH to this DNA segment facilitates conversion of RfaH from its inactive closed to its active open conformation. The interaction network formed between RfaH, non-template DNA and RNAP locks DNA in a conformation that renders RNAP resistant to pausing and termination. The effects of such locking on elongation can be mimicked by restraint of the non-template strand due to its shortening. This work advances our understanding of transcription regulation and has important implications for the action of general elongation factors, such as NusG, which lack apparent sequence-specificity, as well as for the mechanisms of other linked processes, such as transcription-coupled DNA repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.