ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2018
Lessons learned from merging wet lab experiments with molecular simulation to improve mAb humanization.
Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Review of the Mechanisms and Clinical Development of Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Germinality does not necessarily define mAb expression and thermal stability.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Systematic testing and specificity mapping of alloantigen-specific chimeric antigen receptors in regulatory T cells.JCI insight · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Humanized monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are among the most promising modern therapeutics, but defined engineering strategies are still not available. Antibody humanization often leads to a loss of affinity, as it is the case for our model antibody Ab2/3H6 (PDB entry 3BQU). Identifying appropriate back-to-mouse mutations is needed to restore binding affinity, but highly challenging. In order to get more insight, we have applied molecular dynamics simulations and correlated them to antibody binding and expression in wet lab experiments. In this study, we discuss six mAb variants and investigate a tyrosine conglomeration, an isopolar substitution and the improvement of antibody binding towards wildtype affinity. In the 3D structure of the mouse wildtype, residue R94h is surrounded by three tyrosines which form a so-called 'tyrosine cage'. We demonstrate that the tyrosine cage has a supporting function for the CDRh3 loop conformation. The isopolar substitution is not able to mimic the function appropriately. Finally, we show that additional light chain mutations can restore binding to wildtype-comparable level, and also improve the expression of the mAb significantly. We conclude that the variable light chain of Ab2/3H6 is of underestimated importance for the interaction with its antigen mAb 2F5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.