Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29757421›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2019

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Acromegaly: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Dale Ding, Gautam U Mehta, Mohana Rao Patibandla, Cheng-Chia Lee, Roman Liscak, Hideyuki Kano, Fu-Yuan Pai, Mikulas Kosak, Nathaniel D Sisterson, Roberto Martinez-Alvarez and 13 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Reirradiation of recurrent brain tumors: a review by the ESTRO CNS Focus Group.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Current treatment landscape of acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Dale DingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
Gautam U MehtaDepartment of Neurosurgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mohana Rao PatibandlaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Cheng-Chia LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Roman LiscakDepartment of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Hideyuki KanoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Fu-Yuan PaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Mikulas Kosak3rd Department of Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Nathaniel D SistersonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Roberto Martinez-AlvarezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ruber Internacional Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Nuria Martinez-MorenoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ruber Internacional Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
David MathieuDivision of Neurosurgery, Centre de recherche du CHUS, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Inga S GrillsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Kevin BlasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Kuei LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Christopher P CifarelliDepartment of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Gennadiy A KatsevmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
John Y K LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brendan McShaneDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Douglas KondziolkaDepartment of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
L Dade LunsfordDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Mary Lee VanceDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Jason P SheehanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a treatment option for persistent or recurrent acromegaly secondary to a growth hormone secreting pituitary adenoma, but its efficacy is inadequately defined.

objectiveTo assess, in a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, the outcomes of SRS for acromegaly and determine predictors.

methodsWe pooled and analyzed data from 10 participating institutions of the International Gamma Knife Research Foundation for patients with acromegaly who underwent SRS with endocrine follow-up of ≥6 mo.

resultsThe study cohort comprised 371 patients with a mean endocrine follow-up of 79 mo. IGF-1 lowering medications were held in 56% of patients who were on pre-SRS medical therapy. The mean SRS treatment volume and margin dose were 3.0 cm3 and 24.2 Gy, respectively. The actuarial rates of initial and durable endocrine remission at 10 yr were 69% and 59%, respectively. The mean time to durable remission after SRS was 38 mo. Biochemical relapse after initial remission occurred in 9%, with a mean time to recurrence of 17 mo. Cessation of IGF-1 lowering medication prior to SRS was the only independent predictor of durable remission (P = .01). Adverse radiation effects included the development of ≥1 new endocrinopathy in 26% and ≥1 cranial neuropathy in 4%.

conclusionSRS is a definitive treatment option for patients with persistent or recurrent acromegaly after surgical resection. There appears to be a statistical association between the cessation of IGF-1 lowering medications prior to SRS and durable remission.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdenomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAcromegalyGamma KnifeGrowth hormoneInsulin-like growth factor-1Pituitary adenomaradiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID29757421
PMCPMC6505445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.