Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29757070›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2018

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Diagnosis and Glycemic Control Among Women of Reproductive Age.

Laura E Britton, Jon M Hussey, Jamie L Crandell, Diane C Berry, Jada L Brooks, Amy G Bryant

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura E Britton1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Jon M Hussey2 Department of Maternal Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Jamie L Crandell1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Diane C Berry1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Jada L Brooks1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Amy G Bryant4 Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

INTERVENTIONS FOR PREVENTING &MANAGING CHRONIC ILLNESST32NR007091 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Cheryl L Giscombe, Cathi Barbra Propper · 1996 to 2026
$11.8M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Sociodemographic, Cognitive, and Affective Antecedents to Pregnancy Planning among Women with DiabetesF31NR017320 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRITTON, LAURA ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2018
$49k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NINR NIH HHS F31 NR017320NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTypes 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus complicate pregnancies and threaten the health of women of reproductive age and their children. Among older adults, diabetes morbidity disproportionately burdens racial/ethnic minorities, but diabetes emergence among younger adults has not been as well characterized. The objective of this study was to describe the distribution of diagnosed diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, suboptimal preconception glycemic control, and prediabetes among women of reproductive age across racial/ethnic backgrounds. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed data collected in 2007-2008 from 6774 nonpregnant women, ages 24-32, in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health). Prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes were identified by fasting glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) and diagnosed diabetes by self-report or antihyperglycemic medication use. We used multinomial regression models to predict prediabetes or diabetes versus normoglycemia. Within women with diabetes, we used logistic regression to predict those being undiagnosed and having suboptimal preconception glycemic control based on A1C.

resultsThe estimated prevalence of diabetes was 6.8%, of which 45.3% was undiagnosed. Diabetes prevalence varied by race/ethnicity (p < 0.001): 15.0% of non-Hispanic black women (75.6% undiagnosed), 7.5% of Hispanic women (48.1% undiagnosed), 4.8% of non-Hispanic white women (22.8% undiagnosed), and 4.5% of Asian women (11.4% undiagnosed). The prevalence of prediabetes was highest in non-Hispanic black (38.5%), followed by Hispanic (27.8%), Asian (25.1%), Native American (20.3%), and non-Hispanic white (16.6%) women.

conclusionsRacial/ethnic disparities exist among women of reproductive age with prediabetes and diabetes. Meeting their healthcare needs requires addressing health inequities and coordination of diabetes management with reproductive health.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPreconception CarePrediabetic StateAdultBlood GlucoseDiagnostic ErrorsEthnicityFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicPrevalenceReproductive HealthUnited StatesBlood Glucosediabetesdisparitiespreconceptionprediabetes

Identifiers

PMID29757070
PMCPMC6205045
OpenAlexW2801359634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.