Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29757018›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology2018

A current structural perspective on PXR and CAR in drug metabolism.

Cameron D Buchman, Sergio C Chai, Taosheng Chen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Structure-guided approach to modulate small molecule binding to a promiscuous ligand-activated protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cameron D Buchmana Department of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics , St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis , TN , USA.
Sergio C Chaia Department of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics , St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis , TN , USA.
Taosheng Chena Department of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics , St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis , TN , USA.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Regulation of xenobiotic receptors PXR and CAR: implications in drug dispositionR35GM118041 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Taosheng Chen · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
Regulation of drug disposition by a novel microRNA-mediated pathwayR01GM110034 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHEN, TAOSHENG · 2014 to 2016
$998k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110034NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPregnane X receptor (PXR) and the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) are two members of the nuclear receptor superfamily that play major roles in the expression of various drug metabolism enzymes and are known for their ligand promiscuity. As with other nuclear receptors, PXR and CAR are each composed of a ligand-binding domain (LBD) and a DNA-binding domain (DBD) connected by a hinge region. Areas covered: This review focuses on the information obtained over the last 15+ years from X-ray crystallography studies of the structure of PXR and CAR. Areas of focus include the mobility of each structure, based on temperature factors (B factors); multimeric interactions; the binding of coregulators and ligands; and how the crystal structures were obtained. The first use of hydrogen-deuterium exchange coupled with mass spectroscopy (HDX-MS) to study compound-protein interactions in the PXR-LBD is also addressed. Expert opinion: X-ray crystallography studies have provided us with an excellent understanding of how the LBDs of each receptor function; however, many questions remain concerning the structure of these receptors. Future research should focus on determining the co-crystal structure of an antagonist bound to PXR and on studying the structural aspects of the full-length CAR and PXR proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsConstitutive Androstane ReceptorCrystallography, X-RayDeuterium Exchange MeasurementHumansLigandsMass SpectrometryPharmaceutical PreparationsPregnane X ReceptorReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, SteroidConstitutive Androstane ReceptorLigandsPharmaceutical PreparationsPregnane X ReceptorReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, SteroidConstitutive androstane receptorHDX-MSpregnane X receptorstructural biologyX-ray crystallography

Identifiers

PMID29757018
PMCPMC6002932
OpenAlexW2804324113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.