Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29756654›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2018

Effect of reward type on object discrimination learning in socially monogamous coppery titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus).

Sara M Freeman, Nancy Rebout, Karen L Bales

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara M FreemanCalifornia National Primate Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7422-3440
Nancy ReboutCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Cognitive and Social Ethology, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Karen L BalesCalifornia National Primate Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
University of California, Davis · USUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
Effects of Chronic Intranasal OxytocinR01HD071998 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BALES, KAREN L. · 2012 to 2016
$4.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071998NIH HHS P51 OD011107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly valued food items are often used as rewards to reinforce an animal's behavior. For social species, social interaction is rewarding and can drive an individual's behavior as well. In the currently study, we wanted to compare the efficacy of a food reward and a social reward on object discrimination learning in socially monogamous titi monkeys. We hypothesized that titi monkeys would perform more accurately for a social reward (their pair mate) than for a food reward (a highly desired food item). Eleven adult titi monkeys were tested with a two-object visual discrimination task for both types of reward. The colors and shapes of the objects in the two-object discrimination task were counterbalanced across subjects. During each trial, subjects were shown two objects, and the trial ended when the subject touched the reinforced shape (S+) or after 5 min. A correct trial was defined as one when the subject touched S+ first. We found that 45.5% of subjects were able to learn the task with a social reward, and 83.3% were able to learn the task with a food reward. We found that subjects balked more often and had fewer correct trials for the social reward. Finally, subjects took longer to approach the shapes for a social reward, possibly indicating lower motivation to engage in the task when a social reward is used compared to a food reward. Although significantly fewer subjects met criteria of success with the social reward than with the food reward, our results show that titi monkeys can learn a visual discrimination task with either type of reward.

Indexed as

Discrimination LearningRewardAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleFoodMalePair BondPitheciidaeSocial Behaviormonogamynonhuman primatepositive reinforcementsocial rewardvisual discrimination

Identifiers

PMID29756654
PMCPMC6133243
OpenAlexW2804544372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.