Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29756486›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2018

Osteonectin as a screening marker for pancreatic cancer: A prospective study.

Angeliki Papapanagiotou, George Sgourakis, Kyriakos Karkoulias, Dimitris Raptis, Edward Parkin, Pantelis Brotzakis, Sanjay Panchal, Athanasios G Papavassiliou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Understanding the Conundrum of Pancreatic Cancer in the Omics Sciences Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Potential biomarkers for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Angeliki Papapanagiotou1 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Department of Biological Chemistry, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-2128
George Sgourakis2 2nd Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology Unit of Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Kyriakos Karkoulias2 2nd Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology Unit of Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9256-9947
Dimitris Raptis2 2nd Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology Unit of Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Edward Parkin4 Faculty of Health and Medicine, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Pantelis Brotzakis2 2nd Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology Unit of Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Sanjay Panchal3 Department of Surgery, Furness General Hospital, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay, Barrow-in-Furness, UK.
Athanasios G Papavassiliou1 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Department of Biological Chemistry, Athens, Greece.
Hellenic Red Cross · GRFurness General Hospital · GBNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRFurness College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Osteonectin plays a central role in various processes during the development of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This prospective pilot study was performed to determine the feasibility of serum osteonectin as a screening tool for pancreatic cancer. Methods Blood samples were collected from 15 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer and 30 matched healthy controls. Serum osteonectin was measured using an osteonectin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The primary outcomes were the diagnostic performance of serum osteonectin and the threshold value for differentiation of patients from controls. Results The median/quartile range of serum osteonectin in patients and controls were 306.8/288.5 ng/mL and 67.5/39.8 ng/mL, respectively. Osteonectin concentrations significantly differed among the study groups. A plasma osteonectin concentration of >100.18 ng/mL as selected by the receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated an estimated area under the curve of 86% for prediction of pancreatic cancer. Tumour size was a significant predictor of serum osteonectin. A statistically significant difference in serum osteonectin between T1/T2 and T3/T4 tumours was found. Post-hoc comparisons revealed statistically significant differences in the serum osteonectin among the control, T1/T2, and T3/T4 groups. Conclusion Osteonectin may be used as a screening tool for pancreatic cancer, although this must be validated in prospective studies.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteonectinPancreatic NeoplasmsPilot ProjectsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReference ValuesBiomarkers, TumorOsteonectinadenocarcinomabiomarkersOsteonectinpancreatic cancerprospective studyscreening marker

Identifiers

PMID29756486
PMCPMC6124255
OpenAlexW2803812655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.