ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2018
Absence of early HHV-6 reactivation after cord blood allograft predicts powerful graft-versus-tumor effect.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of HHV-6 and mortality after hematopoietic cell transplant.Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Pooled it
- A phase II study of reduced intensity double umbilical cord blood transplantation using fludarabine, melphalan, and low dose total body irradiation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2020Trial
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 75% of cord blood transplant (CBT) recipients experience human herpes virus-6 (HHV-6) reactivation. Considering the immunomodulatory effects of HHV-6, we hypothesized that early HHV-6 reactivation may influence the risk of relapse of the underlying hematologic malignancy. In 152 CBT recipients with hematological malignancies, we determined the association between HHV-6 reactivation by day +28 and 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse. In univariate analysis, the absence of HHV-6 reactivation (n = 32) was associated with less relapse (26 [18-35]% vs. 7 [0-17]% in groups with vs. without HHV-6 reactivation, respectively; P = .03). This difference was due to a remarkably low relapse incidence among patients without HHV-6 reactivation. In multivariable analysis, the absence of HHV-6 reactivation was associated with less relapse (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.2 [0.05-0.9], P = .03). This association was independent of patient-, disease-, and transplant-related characteristics known to influence the risk of relapse. Natural killer cell and T-cell reconstitution at day +28 were similar between patients with vs. without HHV-6 reactivation. Our results suggest that CB allografts not complicated by HHV-6 reactivation by day +28 have a powerful graft-versus-tumor effect. Knowledge about early HHV-6 reactivation may stratify patients at day +28 into low vs. high relapse risk groups.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.