ReviewFrontiers in medicine2018
Clinical Genetics in Interstitial Lung Disease.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic evidence reveals a causal relationship between rheumatoid arthritis and interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Novel diagnostic techniques in interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and the role of genetics in the era of precision medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- RNA-seq analysis of the human surfactant air-liquid interface culture reveals alveolar type II cell-like transcriptome.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2022Article
- Monogenic gene variants in lung transplant recipients with usual interstitial pneumonia.ERJ open research · 2022Article
- Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Current Perspective.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Comparative analysis of the bronchoalveolar microbiome in Portuguese patients with different chronic lung disorders.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Telomeres in Interstitial Lung Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Updates in using a molecular classifier to identify usual interstitial pneumonia in conventional transbronchial lung biopsy samples.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2020Article
- Decrypting the crosstalk of noncoding RNAs in the progression of IPF.Molecular biology reports · 2020Review
- Clinical characteristics of patients with familial idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (f-IPF).BMC pulmonary medicine · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a heterogeneous group of diffuse parenchymal lung processes with overlapping clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic features. Among the most common and deadly ILDs are idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP). As the name implies, the cause of IPF remains elusive, but a variety of genetic and infectious risk factors have been identified. CHP results from chronic inhalation of an organic antigen, usually of avian or mold origin, and may occur in patients with a genetic predisposition. While IPF is treated with anti-fibrotic compounds, CHP is generally treated by suppression of the immune system and elimination of the causative antigen. Despite advances in our understanding of IPF and CHP, there exists substantial variability in the diagnosis and treatment of these disease processes. Furthermore, IPF and CHP natural history and treatment response remain far from uniform, leaving it unclear which patients derive the most benefit from disease-specific therapy. While clinical prediction models have improved our understanding of outcome risk in patients with various forms of ILD, recent advances in genomic technology provides a valuable opportunity to begin understanding the basis for outcome variability. Such advances will ultimately allow for the incorporation of genomic markers into risk stratification and clinical decision-making. In this piece, we highlight recent advances in our understanding of the genomic factors that influence susceptibility and outcome risk among patients with IPF and CHP. Genomic modalities used to identify these genomic markers include genome-wide association studies, analyses of gene expression, drug-gene interaction testing, telomere length determination, telomerase mutation analysis, and studies of the lung microbiome. We then identify gaps in knowledge that should be addressed to help facilitate the incorporation of these genomic technologies into ILD clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.