ArticleBiomedical physics & engineering express2015
Neutron activation analysis with a Monte Carlo simulation for kidney stones.
Article in Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanistic questions regarding kidney stone formation have led researchers to look for the presence of trace elements. Neutron activation analysis is able to identify elements at parts-per-million concentrations. Four different types of kidney stones were irradiated with thermal neutrons to produce radioisotopes. Gamma spectroscopy of samples at different counting times was used to reduce identification errors by correlating results with the half-life of identified elements. For more precise identification, Monte Carlo simulation was used to cross-check the identification process. The simulation showed promising results that could lead to fast and accurate identification of trace elements as the simulation code is improved. Sodium (Na), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), bromine (Br), samarium (Sm), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), ytterbium (Yb), gold (Au), cobalt (Co), and manganese (Mn) were identified as being present in the stones, by both the experimentally measured gamma spectrum and the simulation. Among these, Ca, Br, and Zn were found to be of potential clinical relevance via a literature review. Concentrations of the elements were compared to those noted in the literature. For uric acid stones, a correlation with the literature was found for Zn and Ca. A negative correlation was found between Zn and Br for non-uric acid stones. More samples are needed to test for statistical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.