Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29755703›Full record

ArticleMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases2018

Gut Colonization with Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Adversely Impacts the Outcome in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Results of A Prospective Surveillance Study.

Sarita Rani Jaiswal, Satyanker Gupta, Rekha Saji Kumar, Amit Sherawat, Ashok Rajoreya, Saroj K Dash, Gitali Bhagwati, Suparno Chakrabarti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. NDM-ProducingJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarita Rani JaiswalManashi Chakrabarti Foundation, Kolkata, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi.
Satyanker GuptaDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi.
Rekha Saji KumarDepartment of Microbiology, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi.
Amit SherawatDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi.
Ashok RajoreyaManashi Chakrabarti Foundation, Kolkata, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi.
Saroj K DashDepartment of Microbiology, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi.
Gitali BhagwatiDepartment of Microbiology, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi.
Suparno ChakrabartiManashi Chakrabarti Foundation, Kolkata, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGut colonisation with carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is a risk factor for CRE bacteremia and patients with haematological malignancies (HM) are at the highest risk of mortality.

methodsWe conducted a prospective surveillance study of gut colonisation with CRE and its impact on the outcome of 225 consecutive patients of HM over 28 months.

resultsThe median age of the cohort was 46 years, the majority with acute leukaemia. 48 (21%) patients were colonised with CRE on admission (CAD). Another 46 patients were colonised with CRE in the hospital (CIH). The risk factors for CAD and CIH were a diagnosis of acute leukaemia and duration of hospital stay respectively. CRE accounted for 77% of infection-related mortality (IRM). The incidence of CRE bacteremia in CRE positive patients was 18% (17/94), and mortality in those with CRE bacteremia was 100%. IRM was 35.3% in CIH group compared to 10.5% in the CAD group (p=0.0001). IRM was highest in those with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and CIH (54.9% p=0.0001). On multivariate analysis, CIH was the most important risk factor for IRM (HR-7.2).

conclusionOur data demonstrate that a substantial proportion of patients with HM are colonised with CRE without prior hospitalisation, but those with nosocomial colonisation have the highest risk of mortality, particularly in those with AML.

Indexed as

Acute myeloid leukemiaCarbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceaeColonizationHaematological malignanciesMortality

Identifiers

PMID29755703
PMCPMC5937952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.