Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29755661›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Identification of copy number alterations in colon cancer from analysis of amplicon-based next generation sequencing data.

Duarte Mendes Oliveira, Gianluca Santamaria, Carmelo Laudanna, Simona Migliozzi, Pietro Zoppoli, Michael Quist, Catie Grasso, Chiara Mignogna, Laura Elia, Maria Concetta Faniello and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Altered SERCA Expression in Breast Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Duarte Mendes OliveiraDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Gianluca SantamariaDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Carmelo LaudannaDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Simona MigliozziDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Pietro ZoppoliDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Michael QuistFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Catie GrassoUniversity of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Chiara MignognaDipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Laura EliaDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria Concetta FanielloDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Cinzia MarinaroDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Rosario SaccoDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Francesco CorcioneUOC Chirurgia Generale, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, Napoli, Italy.
Giuseppe VigliettoDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Donatella MalangaDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Antonia RizzutoDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Magna Graecia University · ITFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility to detect copy number alterations in colon cancer samples using Next Generation Sequencing data and to elucidate the association between copy number alterations in specific genes and the development of cancer in different colon segments. We report the successful detection of somatic changes in gene copy number in 37 colon cancer patients by analysis of sequencing data through Amplicon CNA Algorithm. Overall, we have found a total of 748 significant copy number alterations in 230 significant genes, of which 143 showed CN losses and 87 showed CN gains. Validation of results was performed on 20 representative genes by quantitative qPCR and/or immunostaining. By this analysis, we have identified 4 genes that were subjected to copy number alterations in tumors arising in all colon segments (defined "common genes") and the presence of copy number alterations in 14 genes that were significantly associated to one specific site (defined "site-associated genes"). Finally, copy number alterations in ASXL1, TSC1 and IL7R turned out to be clinically relevant since the loss of TSC1 and IL7R was associated with advanced stages and/or reduced survival whereas copy number gain of ASXL1 was associated with good prognosis.

Indexed as

colon cancercopy number alterationNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29755661
PMCPMC5945505
OpenAlexW2801379868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.