Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29755650›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Preclinical comparison of proteasome and ubiquitin E1 enzyme inhibitors in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: the identification of mechanisms of differential sensitivity.

Angela McHugh, Kenneth Fernandes, Andrew P South, Jemima E Mellerio, Julio C Salas-Alanís, Charlotte M Proby, Irene M Leigh, Mark K Saville

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Oncotarget · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A patent review of the ubiquitin ligase system: 2015-2018.Expert opinion on therapeutic patents · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Angela McHughDivision of Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Kenneth FernandesDivision of Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Andrew P SouthDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Jemima E MellerioSt. John's Institute of Dermatology, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Julio C Salas-AlanísDEBRA Mexico, Azteca Guadalupe, Nuevo Leon, 67150 Mexico.
Charlotte M ProbyDivision of Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Irene M LeighDivision of Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Mark K SavilleDivision of Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
University of Dundee · GBCentro de Estudios Universitarios Adolfo López Mateos · MXKing's College London · GBThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteasome inhibitors have distinct properties and the biochemical consequences of suppressing ubiquitin E1 enzymes and the proteasome differ. We compared the effects of the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib, ixazomib and carfilzomib and the ubiquitin E1 enzyme inhibitor MLN7243/TAK-243 on cell viability and cell death in normal keratinocytes and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) cell lines. The effects of both a pulse of treatment and more extended incubation were investigated. This is relevant to directly-delivered therapy (topical treatment/intratumoral injection) where the time of exposure can be controlled and a short exposure may better reflect systemically-delivered inhibitor pharmacokinetics. These agents can selectively kill cSCC cells but there are variations in the pattern of cSCC cell line sensitivity/resistance. Variations in the responses to proteasome inhibitors are associated with differences in the specificity of the inhibitors for the three proteolytic activities of the proteasome. There is greater selectivity for killing cSCC cells compared to normal keratinocytes with a pulse of proteasome inhibitor treatment than with a more extended exposure. We provide evidence that c-MYC-dependent NOXA upregulation confers susceptibility to a short incubation with proteasome inhibitors by priming cSCC cells for rapid BAK-dependent death. We observed that bortezomib-resistant cSCC cells can be sensitive to MLN7243-induced death. Low expression of the ubiquitin E1 UBA1/UBE1 participates in conferring susceptibility to MLN7243 by increasing sensitivity to MLN7243-mediated attenuation of ubiquitination. This study supports further investigation of the potential of proteasome and ubiquitin E1 inhibition for cSCC therapy. Direct delivery of inhibitors could facilitate adequate exposure of skin cancers.

Indexed as

MLN7243/TAK-243proteasomesquamous cell carcinomaUBA1UBA6

Identifiers

PMID29755650
PMCPMC5945540
OpenAlexW2800020922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.