ArticleThe open microbiology journal2018
Probiotics Strains Modulate Gut Microbiota and Lipid Metabolism in Mule Ducks.
Article in The open microbiology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- FABP4 regulates inflammation and lipid transport via PPARγ signaling pathway in goose primary hepatocytes.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Effect of postbiotics on the production parameters of rearing goose.Veterinary and animal science · 2025Article
- Major Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens in Poultry: Implications for Human Health and the Poultry Industry and Probiotic Mitigation Strategies.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Regulation of the cecal microbiota community and the fatty liver deposition by the addition of brewers' spent grain to feed of Landes geese.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- The intestinal microbial composition in Greylag geese differs with steatosis induction mode: spontaneous or induced by overfeeding.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
- Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ameliorates HProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2020Article
- Stable Colonization of Orally AdministeredBioMed research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLivestock production should respond to societal, environmental and economic changes. Since 2006 and the ban on antibiotics as growth factors in European Union, the use of probiotics has become widespread and has demonstrated the effect of intestinal microbiota on the performance of farm animals.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of supplementation with
methodThe mule ducks were reared for 79 days and overfed for 12 days with or without probiotics. Samples were collected at 14 (starting period) and 91 days (end of overfeeding period), 3 hours post feeding.
resultsIrrespective of digestive content, age, level of feed intake or supplementation with probiotics,
conclusionFinally, probiotic supplementation had only a slight impact on gene expression and microbiota diversity, both at 14 days and after overfeeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.