Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29755511›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2018

Examination Stress Results in Attentional Bias and Altered Neural Reactivity in Test-Anxious Individuals.

Xiaocong Zhang, Yunying Dong, Renlai Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventional Strategies to Reduce Test Anxiety among Nursing Students: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Randomized trial estimating effects of hypnosisWorld journal of psychiatry · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of Expressive Writing on "Choking under Pressure" in High Test-Anxious Individuals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The neural chronometry of threat-related attentional bias: Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for early and late stages of selective attentional processing.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaocong ZhangResearch Center for Learning Science, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0897-5796
Yunying DongSchool of Education, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou 213001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0252-5244
Renlai ZhouResearch Center for Learning Science, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7035-7097
Beijing Normal University · CNJiangsu University of Technology · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examination stress occurs so frequently in the lives of students. The neural mechanisms of attentional bias induced by examination stress in test-anxious individuals remain unclear. Accordingly, we investigated the attentional bias toward test-related threatening words in selected high and low test-anxious participants under the stress of final examinations by using an event-related potential (ERP) technique. A classic dot-probe paradigm was adopted with a test-related/test-unrelated threatening word and a neutral word pair as cues. Results showed attention bias and enhanced N200 amplitude toward test-related threat in high test-anxious individuals, whereas avoidance of test-related threat and decreased N200 amplitude were shown in low test-anxious individuals. Additionally, ERP data revealed the relatively enhanced LPP amplitude in low test-anxious participants compared with that in high test-anxious participants. No attentional bias toward test-unrelated threat was found. In conclusion, examination stress resulted in attentional bias and functional perturbations of a brain circuitry that reacted rapidly to test-related threat in high test-anxious individuals.

Indexed as

Test Anxiety ScaleAdolescentAnxietyAttentional BiasBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleNerve NetPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29755511
PMCPMC5884033
OpenAlexW2791814193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.