Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29755344›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2018

Endophytic Fungi-Alternative Sources of Cytotoxic Compounds: A Review.

Fazilath Uzma, Chakrabhavi D Mohan, Abeer Hashem, Narasimha M Konappa, Shobith Rangappa, Praveen V Kamath, Bhim P Singh, Venkataramana Mudili, Vijai K Gupta, Chandra N Siddaiah and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of natural (Z)-13-docosenamide derived fromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Biotechnological approaches for the production of camptothecin.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fazilath UzmaMicrobial Metabolite Research Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India.
Chakrabhavi D MohanDepartment of Studies in Molecular Biology, University of Mysore, Mysore, India.
Abeer HashemBotany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Narasimha M KonappaDepartment of Studies in Biotechnology, University of Mysore, Mysore, India.
Shobith RangappaAdichunchanagiri Institute for Molecular Medicine, BG Nagara, Mandya, India.
Praveen V KamathMicrobial Metabolite Research Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India.
Bhim P SinghMolecular Microbiology and Systematics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Mizoram University, Aizawl, India.
Venkataramana MudiliMicrobiology Division, DRDO-BU-Centre for Life sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India.
Vijai K GuptaDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, ERA Chair of Green Chemistry, School of Science, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Chandra N SiddaiahDepartment of Studies in Biotechnology, University of Mysore, Mysore, India.
Srinivas ChowdappaMicrobial Metabolite Research Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India.
Abdulaziz A AlqarawiPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Elsayed F Abd AllahPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a major cause of death worldwide, with an increasing number of cases being reported annually. The elevated rate of mortality necessitates a global challenge to explore newer sources of anticancer drugs. Recent advancements in cancer treatment involve the discovery and development of new and improved chemotherapeutics derived from natural or synthetic sources. Natural sources offer the potential of finding new structural classes with unique bioactivities for cancer therapy. Endophytic fungi represent a rich source of bioactive metabolites that can be manipulated to produce desirable novel analogs for chemotherapy. This review offers a current and integrative account of clinically used anticancer drugs such as taxol, podophyllotoxin, camptothecin, and vinca alkaloids in terms of their mechanism of action, isolation from endophytic fungi and their characterization, yield obtained, and fungal strain improvement strategies. It also covers recent literature on endophytic fungal metabolites from terrestrial, mangrove, and marine sources as potential anticancer agents and emphasizes the findings for cytotoxic bioactive compounds tested against specific cancer cell lines.

Indexed as

anticancer agentsbioactive metabolitescamptothecinfungal alkaloidsnatural compoundspodophyllotoxintaxolvinca alkaloids

Identifiers

PMID29755344
PMCPMC5932204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.