ArticleThe Stata journal
Estimating inverse-probability weights for longitudinal data with dropout or truncation: The xtrccipw command.
Article in The Stata journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a Universal, Classroom-Based Preventive Intervention (PAX GBG) in Estonia: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020Trial
- Cognitive performance in patients with ischemic stroke and additional myocardial injury - results from the multicenter prospective observational PRAISE study.Neurological research and practice · 2025Article
- Do type, timing and duration of life course non-employment differentially predict dementia risk? An application of sequence analysis.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Article
- Do obstructive and restrictive pulmonary disorders increase the incidence risk of dynapenia in adults aged 50 and older?Archives of gerontology and geriatrics · 2025Article
- Designing digital health interventions with causal inference and multi-armed bandits: a review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Depressive symptoms and anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor GluN1 antibody seropositivity in the PROSpective cohort with incident stroke.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2023Article
- Serum anti-NMDA-receptor antibodies and cognitive function after ischemic stroke (PROSCIS-B).Journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Gout and Hospital Admission for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions: Risks and Trajectories.The Journal of rheumatology · 2022Article
- Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal population-based study of aging.International psychogeriatrics · 2021Article
- Changes in gambling behaviour and related problems in clients seeking help in outpatient addiction care: Results from a 36-month follow-up study in Bavaria.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2021Article
- Tocilizumab in COVID-19: Factors Associated With Mortality Before and After Treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up.BMC medical research methodology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals may drop out of a longitudinal study, rendering their outcomes unobserved but still well defined. However, they may also undergo truncation (for example, death), beyond which their outcomes are no longer meaningful. Kurland and Heagerty (2005,
Indexed as
Identifiers
29755297PMC5947963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.