Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29755214›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of phycology2018

Ecophysiological and morphological comparison of two populations of

Lenka Procházková, Daniel Remias, Andreas Holzinger, Tomáš Řezanka, Linda Nedbalová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of phycology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Snow and Glacial Algae: A ReviewJournal of phycology · 2020
    Review
  12. Cysts of the Snow AlgaFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Ecophysiology ofMicroorganisms · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lenka ProcházkováCharles University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44 Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniel RemiasUniversity of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Stelzhamerstr. 23, A-4600 Wels, Austria.
Andreas HolzingerDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Tomáš ŘezankaInstitute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic.
Linda NedbalováCharles University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44 Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 1951Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24242Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on analyses of multiple molecular markers (18S rDNA, ITS1, ITS2 rDNA,

Indexed as

alpine lakeAstaxanthinChlainomonasfatty acidsfield sampleHigh Tatrasmorphologyphotosynthesissnow algaeultrastructure

Identifiers

PMID29755214
PMCPMC5940174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.