Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29755158›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie2018

A Comparative Study of Segregation Patterns in Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden: Neighbourhood Concentration and Representation of Non-European Migrants.

Eva K Andersson, Bo Malmberg, Rafael Costa, Bart Sleutjes, Marcin Jan Stonawski, Helga A G de Valk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neighbourhood Concentration and Representation of Non-European Migrants: New Results from Norway.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Residential Segregation of European and Non-European Migrants in Sweden: 1990-2012.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva K Andersson1Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bo Malmberg1Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rafael Costa2Faculty of Economic, Social and Political Sciences and Solvay Business School, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Bart Sleutjes3Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI)/KNAW/University of Groningen, the Hague, the Netherlands.
Marcin Jan Stonawski4Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Helga A G de Valk3Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI)/KNAW/University of Groningen, the Hague, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we use geo-coded, individual-level register data on four European countries to compute comparative measures of segregation that are independent of existing geographical sub-divisions. The focus is on non-European migrants, for whom aggregates of egocentric neighbourhoods (with different population counts) are used to assess small-scale, medium-scale, and large-scale segregation patterns. At the smallest scale level, corresponding to neighbourhoods with 200 persons, patterns of over- and under-representation are strikingly similar. At larger-scale levels, Belgium stands out as having relatively strong over- and under-representation. More than 55% of the Belgian population lives in large-scale neighbourhoods with moderate under- or over-representation of non-European migrants. In the other countries, the corresponding figures are between 30 and 40%. Possible explanations for the variation across countries are differences in housing policies and refugee placement policies. Sweden has the largest and Denmark the smallest non-European migrant population, in relative terms. Thus, in both migrant-dense and native-born-dense areas, Swedish neighbourhoods have a higher concentration and Denmark a lower concentration of non-European migrants than the other countries. For large-scale, migrant-dense neighbourhoods, however, levels of concentration are similar in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Thus, to the extent that such concentrations contribute to spatial inequalities, these countries are facing similar policy challenges.

Indexed as

BelgiumComparisonConcentrationDenmarkNon-European immigrantsRepresentationSegregationSwedenThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID29755158
PMCPMC5932096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.