Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29754995›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2019

Additive Benefit of Radiomics Over Size Alone in the Distinction Between Benign Lesions and Luminal A Cancers on a Large Clinical Breast MRI Dataset.

Heather M Whitney, Nathan S Taylor, Karen Drukker, Alexandra V Edwards, John Papaioannou, David Schacht, Maryellen L Giger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heather M WhitneyDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2026 Chicago, IL 60637; Department of Physics, Wheaton College, 501 College Avenue, Wheaton, IL 60187. Electronic address: hwhitney@uchicago.edu.
Nathan S TaylorDepartment of Physics, Wheaton College, 501 College Avenue, Wheaton, IL 60187.
Karen DrukkerDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2026 Chicago, IL 60637.
Alexandra V EdwardsDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2026 Chicago, IL 60637.
John PapaioannouDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2026 Chicago, IL 60637.
David SchachtDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2026 Chicago, IL 60637.
Maryellen L GigerDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2026 Chicago, IL 60637. Electronic address: m-giger@uchicago.edu.

Funding

VIRAL ONCOLOGY CORE FACILITYP30CA014599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MARK W. LINGEN · 1985 to 2026
$122.1M
Quantitative Image Analysis for Assessing Response to Breast Cancer TherapyU01CA195564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014599NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesThe objective of this study was to demonstrate improvement in distinguishing between benign lesions and luminal A breast cancers in a large clinical breast magnetic resonance imaging database by using quantitative radiomics over maximum linear size alone. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, 264 benign lesions and 390 luminal A breast cancers were automatically segmented from dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance images. Thirty-eight radiomic features were extracted. Tenfold cross validation was performed to assess the ability to distinguish between lesions and cancers using maximum linear size alone and lesion signatures obtained with stepwise feature selection and a linear discriminant analysis classifier including and excluding size features. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the figure of merit.

resultsFor maximum linear size alone, AUC and 95% confidence interval was 0.684 (0.642, 0.724) compared to 0.728 (0.687, 0.766) (P = 0.005) and 0.729 (0.689, 0.767) (P = 0.005) for lesion signature feature selection protocols including and excluding size features, respectively. The features of irregularity and entropy were chosen in all folds when size features were included and excluded. AUC for the radiomic signature using feature selection from all features was statistically equivalent to using feature selection from all features excluding size features, within an equivalence margin of 2%.

conclusionsInclusion of multiple radiomic features, automatically extracted from magnetic resonance images, in a lesion signature significantly improved the ability to distinguish between benign lesions and luminal A breast cancers, compared to using maximum linear size alone. The radiomic features of irregularity and entropy appear to play an important but not a solitary role within the context of feature selection and computer-aided diagnosis.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRadiographyRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBreast cancerluminal AMRIradiomics

Identifiers

PMID29754995
PMCPMC9392156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.