ArticleJournal of critical care2018
Dead space analysis at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.
Article in Journal of critical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-Term Physiological Effects of Moderate PEEP Levels in Invasively Ventilated Patients Without Acute or Chronic Lung Disease.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Positive end-expiratory pressure in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Influence of the end inspiratory pause on ventilatory efficiency and respiratory mechanics in patients undergoing robotic surgery under a tailored open lung approach: a prospective-paired study.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025Article
- Validation of a method for estimating pulmonary dead space in ventilated beagles to correct exhaled propofol concentration in mixed air.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Oxygenation or Driving Pressure for Setting PEEP in Obese Patients With COVID-19 ARDS.Respiratory care · 2023Article
- Effect of prone positioning on end-expiratory lung volume, strain and oxygenation change over time in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective physiological study.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Monitoring Expired COFrontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- A simplified 4-parameter model of volumetric capnograms improves calculations of airway dead space and slope of Phase III.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Article
- Influence of overdistension/recruitment induced by high positive end-expiratory pressure on ventilation-perfusion matching assessed by electrical impedance tomography with saline bolus.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Article
- Respiratory mechanics and gas exchanges in the early course of COVID-19 ARDS: a hypothesis-generating study.Annals of intensive care · 2020Article
- [Volumetric capnography for analysis and optimization of ventilation and gas exchange].Der Anaesthesist · 2020Article
- Clinical use of volumetric capnography in mechanically ventilated patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Review
- Exhaled COJournal of critical care · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byExhaled CO2018
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on Bohr's dead space (VD MATERIAL AND
methodsFourteen ARDS patients under lung protective ventilation settings were submitted to 4 different levels of PEEP (0, 6, 10, 16 cmH
resultsTwo groups of patients responded differently to PEEP when comparing baseline with 16-PEEP: those in which driving pressure increased > 15% (∆P
conclusionsIncreases in PEEP result in higher VD
Indexed as
Identifiers
29754942What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.