ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2018
Selection bias in population-representative studies? A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survival as a source of confounding, selection bias, and effect modification.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Body mass index trajectories and all-cause mortality in older Chinese adults: Hong Kong's Elderly Health Service Cohort.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2025Article
- Impact of Alcohol Consumption on Lifespan: a Mendelian randomization study in Europeans.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Association of Body Mass Index and Parkinson Disease: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.Neurology · 2024Article
- Dose-Response Associations of Lipid Traits With Coronary Artery Disease and Mortality.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Genetic proxies for calcium channel blockers and cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.Journal of human hypertension · 2023Article
- Effect of basal metabolic rate on lifespan: a sex-specific Mendelian randomization study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Mendelian randomization.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022Article
- Emerging biomaterial-based strategies for personalized therapeutic in situ cancer vaccines.Biomaterials · 2022Review
- Mendelian Randomisation Study of Smoking, Alcohol, and Coffee Drinking in Relation to Parkinson's Disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2022Article
- Reporting guidelines for human microbiome research: the STORMS checklist.Nature medicine · 2021Review
- The role of testosterone in chronic kidney disease and kidney function in men and women: a bi-directional Mendelian randomization study in the UK Biobank.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- Sex-Specific Genetically Predicted Iron Status in relation to 12 Vascular Diseases: A Mendelian Randomization Study in the UK Biobank.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Lean mass, grip strength and risk of type 2 diabetes: a bi-directional Mendelian randomisation study.Diabetologia · 2019Article
- Sex-specific Mendelian randomization study of genetically predicted insulin and cardiovascular events in the UK Biobank.Communications biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29754782What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.