ArticleHepatology international2018
Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir with or without ribavirin: large real-life results of patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4.
Article in Hepatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04387526 (Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir Plus Daclatasvir With or Without Ribavirin), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir Plus Daclatasvir With or Without Ribavirin: Large Real-life Results of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbiome dysbiosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with persistent HCV viremia versus viral clearance: a cross-sectional study.Gut pathogens · 2025Article
- The gut microbiome in diabetic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: distinct bacterial compositional shifts after hepatitis C virus eradication.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- CD4/CD8 Ratio could be predictor of burden hepatocellular carcinoma in Egyptian chronic hepatitis C after combined sofosbuvir and daclatasvir therapy.African health sciences · 2023Article
- The impact of HCV eradication on hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, cytokine production, and insulin receptor substrate-1 and 2 expression in patients with HCV infection.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2022Article
- Three regimens for re-treatment failure of Sofosbuvir-based therapy for chronic hepatitis-C genotype-4: a cohort study.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2022Observational
- Article
- Article
- Viral Hepatitis C Therapy: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations: A 2019 Update.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2019Review
- Consensus on management of hepatitis C virus infection in resource-limited Ukraine and Commonwealth of Independent States regions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 4 in the DAA era.Virology journal · 2018Review
- Towards hepatitis C virus elimination: Egyptian experience, achievements and limitations.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Hepatitis C virus genotype 4-infection and interferon-free treatment in Egypt.Hepatology international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimClinical studies evaluating the efficacy of daclatasvir (DCV) for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 (GT4) infection are scarce. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCV plus sofosbuvir (SOF) with or without ribavirin (RBV) for treatment of Egyptian patients infected with HCV GT4.
methodsBetween April 2016 and March of 2017, a large cohort of 946 patients with chronic HCV GT4 was enrolled for completing the treatment. Patients were classified into two groups: group 1 (easy to treat) was treated with a dual therapy of SOF/DCV daily for 12 weeks and group 2 (difficult to treat) was treated with a triple therapy of SOF/DCV/RBV daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy and safety of the treatments were estimated, and baseline characters associated with sustained virological response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) were investigated.
resultsAmong the patient's cohort, SVR12 was achieved by 94% (891/946) in the overall patients, by 95% (718/758) in the easy-to-treat group, and by 92% (173/188) in the difficult-to-treat group. The most common adverse events recorded were fatigue, headache, nausea, asthenia, and gastrointestinal troubles. No patient discontinued treatment due to severe adverse events.
conclusionThe findings from the present study suggested that SOF/DCV (with or without RBV) regimen exhibited high effectiveness, was well tolerated in the treatment of chronic HCV GT 4, and revealed itself as a better option for patients with advanced liver disease, making the eradication of HCV a more realistic target to achieve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29754329What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.