Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29754209›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Activity of Ertapenem against Enterobacteriaceae in seven global regions-SMART 2012-2016.

Sibylle H Lob, Meredith A Hackel, Daryl J Hoban, Katherine Young, Mary R Motyl, Daniel F Sahm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular epidemiology and mechanism ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sibylle H LobInternational Health Management Associates, Inc., 2122 Palmer Drive, Schaumburg, IL, 60173, USA. shlob@ihma.com.
Meredith A HackelInternational Health Management Associates, Inc., 2122 Palmer Drive, Schaumburg, IL, 60173, USA.
Daryl J HobanInternational Health Management Associates, Inc., 2122 Palmer Drive, Schaumburg, IL, 60173, USA.
Katherine YoungMerck & Co., Inc., 2015 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ, 07033, USA.
Mary R MotylMerck & Co., Inc., 2015 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ, 07033, USA.
Daniel F SahmInternational Health Management Associates, Inc., 2122 Palmer Drive, Schaumburg, IL, 60173, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae has been increasing globally especially due to extended-spectrum-β-lactamases (ESBLs), which typically necessitate the use of carbapenems for treatment of serious infections. Emerging carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae further complicate therapy. As part of the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART), this analysis examined the recent activity of a key carbapenem (ertapenem) and other important therapeutic options against Enterobacteriaceae. From 2012 to 2016, 224 hospitals in 57 countries collected up to 100 consecutive gram-negative bacilli from intra-abdominal (IAI) and 50 from urinary tract infections (UTI) per year, totaling 106,300 Enterobacteriaceae isolates. Susceptibility was determined using CLSI broth microdilution and breakpoints. Although statistically significant decreasing trends in ertapenem activity against Enterobacteriaceae were found in all regions except Middle East, the actual size of the decreases was < 3 percentage points, and susceptibility in 2015-2016 remained ca. 90% or higher, ranging from 89.5% in Asia to 97.3% in US/Canada. Of the comparators, only amikacin exceeded these results. Ertapenem was active against > 90% of isolates with ESBL phenotype from Latin America, Middle East, South Pacific, and US/Canada, and against > 80% of MDR isolates in all regions except Africa (72.9%), Asia (75.1%), and Europe (78.0%). Only imipenem, amikacin, and colistin exceeded these rates. Ertapenem, which is popular among clinicians due to its convenient once-daily dosing schedule and favorable safety and tolerability profile, remains highly active against Enterobacteriaceae from IAI and UTI, even as ESBLs and other resistance mechanisms limit therapeutic options, but continued susceptibility testing for surveillance and individual patients is important.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGlobal HealthAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsErtapenemHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsErtapenemEnterobacteriaceaeErtapenemGlobalSMARTSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID29754209
OpenAlexW2802188865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.