Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29754148›Full record

ArticleAging2018

Age prediction of children and adolescents aged 6-17 years: an epigenome-wide analysis of DNA methylation.

Chunxiao Li, Wenjing Gao, Ying Gao, Canqing Yu, Jun Lv, Ruoran Lv, Jiali Duan, Ying Sun, Xianghui Guo, Weihua Cao and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The use of DNA methylation clock in aging research.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chunxiao LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Wenjing GaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Ying GaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Canqing YuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Jun LvDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Ruoran LvBeijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100013, China.
Jiali DuanBeijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100013, China.
Ying SunBeijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100013, China.
Xianghui GuoChaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100021, China.
Weihua CaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Liming LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Peking University · CNBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA methylation age, a good reflection of human aging process, has been used to predict chronological age of adults and newborns. However, the prediction model for children and adolescents was absent. In this study, we aimed to generate a prediction model of chronological age for children and adolescents aged 6-17 years by using age-specific DNA methylation patterns from 180 Chinese twin individuals. We identified 6,350 age-related CpGs from the epigenome-wide association analysis (N=179). 116 known age-related sites in children were confirmed. 83 novel CpGs were selected as predictors from all age-related loci by elastic net regression and they could accurately predict the chronological age of the pediatric population, with a correlation of 0.99 and the error of 0.23 years in the training dataset (N=90). The predictive accuracy in the testing dataset (N=89) was high (correlation=0.93, error=0.62 years). Among the 83 predictors, 49 sites were novel probes not existing on the Illumina 450K BeadChip. The top two predictors of age were on the

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCpG IslandsDNA MethylationGenome-Wide Association StudyAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleadolescentagingchildrenDNA methylationIllumina Infinium MethylationEPIC Beadchipprediction

Identifiers

PMID29754148
PMCPMC5990383
OpenAlexW2801044207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.