Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29754029›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2018

Relationship between fMRI response during a nonverbal memory task and marijuana use in college students.

Alecia D Dager, Madelynn R Tice, Gregory A Book, Howard Tennen, Sarah A Raskin, Carol S Austad, Rebecca M Wood, Carolyn R Fallahi, Keith A Hawkins, Godfrey D Pearlson

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Reciprocal Influences of HIV and Cannabinoids on the Brain and Cognitive Function.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alecia D DagerDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, 300 George St., Suite 901, New Haven, CT 06511, United States; Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Ave, Whitehall Building, Hartford, CT 06106, United States. Electronic address: alecia.dager@yale.edu.
Madelynn R TiceSchool of Public Health, Yale University, 60 College St., New Haven, CT 06520, United States; Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Ave, Whitehall Building, Hartford, CT 06106, United States.
Gregory A BookOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Ave, Whitehall Building, Hartford, CT 06106, United States.
Howard TennenDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Ave., MC 6325, Farmington, CT 06030, United States.
Sarah A RaskinDepartment of Psychology, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford, CT 10106, United States.
Carol S AustadDepartment of Psychological Science, Central Connecticut State University, 1615 Stanley St., Marcus White 228, New Britain, CT 06050, United States.
Rebecca M WoodDepartment of Psychological Science, Central Connecticut State University, 1615 Stanley St., Marcus White 228, New Britain, CT 06050, United States.
Carolyn R FallahiDepartment of Psychological Science, Central Connecticut State University, 1615 Stanley St., Marcus White 228, New Britain, CT 06050, United States.
Keith A HawkinsDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, 300 George St., Suite 901, New Haven, CT 06511, United States.
Godfrey D PearlsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, 300 George St., Suite 901, New Haven, CT 06511, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, P.O. Box 208001, New Haven, CT 06520, United States; Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Ave, Whitehall Building, Hartford, CT 06106, United States.
Hartford Hospital · USCentral Connecticut State University · USCollege Summit · USUConn Health · USYale University · US

Funding

Alcohol Use in College Students:Cognition and fMRIR01AA016599 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PEARLSON, GODFREY D · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
Genetic architecture of alcohol misuse candidate endophenotypesRC1AA019036 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PEARLSON, GODFREY D · 2009 to 2010
$997k
Neurochemical and Functional Correlates of Memory in Emerging Adult Marijuana UsersK01DA038207 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DAGER, ALECIA DENISE · 2015 to 2018
$659k
BEHAVIORAL MARITAL THERAPY FOR WOMEN/MINORITY ALCOHOLICSR01AA010356 · NIAAA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI O'FARRELL, TIMOTHY JAMES · 1994 to 1998
–
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA010356NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016599NIAAA NIH HHS RC1 AA019036NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA038207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marijuana (MJ) is widely used among college students, with peak use between ages 18-22. Research suggests memory dysfunction in adolescent and young adult MJ users, but the neural correlates are unclear. We examined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) response during a memory task among college students with varying degrees of MJ involvement. Participants were 64 college students, ages 18-20, who performed a visual encoding and recognition task during fMRI. MJ use was ascertained for 3 months prior to scanning; 27 individuals reported past 3-month MJ use, and 33 individuals did not. fMRI response was modeled during encoding based on whether targets were subsequently recognized (correct encoding), and during recognition based on target identification (hits). fMRI response in left and right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and hippocampal regions of interest was examined between MJ users and controls. There were no group differences between MJ users and controls on fMRI response during encoding, although single sample t-tests revealed that MJ users failed to activate the hippocampus. During recognition, MJ users showed less fMRI response than controls in right hippocampus (Cohen's d = 0.55), left hippocampus (Cohen's d = 0.67) and left IFG (Cohen's d = 0.61). Heavier MJ involvement was associated with lower fMRI response in left hippocampus and left IFG. This study provides evidence of MJ-related prefrontal and hippocampal dysfunction during recognition memory in college students. These findings may contribute to our previously identified decrements in academic performance in college MJ users and could have substantial implications for academic and occupational functioning.

Indexed as

MemoryAdolescentAdultFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMarijuana AbuseMarijuana SmokingMarijuana UsePrefrontal CortexPsychomotor PerformanceStudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultAdolescencefMRIMarijuanaMemory

Identifiers

PMID29754029
PMCPMC6756147
OpenAlexW2800272667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.