Trial reportBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2018
A Modified Intensive Strategy to Prevent Cytomegalovirus Disease in Seropositive Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation Recipients.
Trial report in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Insights Into Factors Shaping CMV-Specific T-Cell Polyfunctionality After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Cytomegalovirus Viral Load Continues to Predict Poor Outcomes in Adults and Children Despite Improved Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Success.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Hybrid Ganciclovir/Valacyclovir Prophylaxis Reduces CMV Reactivation in High-Risk Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2025Article
- CMV reactivation during pretransplantation evaluation: a novel risk factor for posttransplantation CMV reactivation.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Late cytomegalovirus disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation: significance of novel transplantation techniques.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Diagnostic stewardship to limit repeat plasma cytomegalovirus viral load testing.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Prophylactic Pretransplant Ganciclovir to Reduce Cytomegalovirus Infection After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy · 2023Article
- Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease in umbilical cord blood transplant recipients.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Extended-duration letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection after cord blood transplantation in adults.Blood advances · 2022Article
- Delayed-onset cytomegalovirus infection is frequent after discontinuing letermovir in cord blood transplant recipients.Blood advances · 2021Article
- High Incidence of Herpes Zoster After Cord Blood Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Despite Longer Duration of Antiviral Prophylaxis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Article
- Letermovir prophylaxis through day 100 post transplant is safe and effective compared with alternative CMV prophylaxis strategies following adult cord blood and haploidentical cord blood transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2020Article
- A fifty-year odyssey: prospects for a cytomegalovirus vaccine in transplant and congenital infection.Expert review of vaccines · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byReply to Author.2018
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We previously demonstrated a lower rate of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and disease among seropositive umbilical cord blood transplantation (CBT) recipients receiving an intensive prophylaxis strategy consisting of ganciclovir on days -8 to -2 pretransplantation, high-dose valacyclovir post-transplantation, and twice-weekly serum CMV polymerase chain reaction testing. We hypothesized that a modified intensive strategy excluding pretransplantation ganciclovir would be similarly effective. We compared the risk of CMV reactivation, occurrence of CMV disease, and duration of anti-CMV therapy by day 100 post-CBT in patients receiving the modified intensive and intensive strategies. Forty patients received the modified intensive strategy, and 43 received the intensive strategy. There was no difference in the hazard for CMV reactivation (hazard ratio, 1.1; P = .77). No patients in the modified intensive cohort, but 2 patients in the intensive cohort, developed CMV disease (P = .53). There was no difference in the hazard for early (≤30 days post-CBT; P = .76) or high-level (>1000 IU/mL; P = .37) CMV reactivation. Patients in the modified intensive cohort had marginally higher CMV viral loads and percentage of days of CMV detection and treatment, although the contribution of pretransplantation ganciclovir to these differences is unclear. The overall percentage of treatment days was 32% in both cohorts after accounting for pretransplantation ganciclovir. In conclusion, exclusion of prophylactic ganciclovir before CBT did not impact the risk of CMV reactivation or disease, although CMV kinetics appeared to differ by prevention strategy. Best practices for CMV prevention will need further study as new prophylactic strategies become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.