Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29753002›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2018

NMR-based investigations into target DNA search processes of proteins.

Junji Iwahara, Levani Zandarashvili, Catherine A Kemme, Alexandre Esadze

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junji IwaharaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, United States. Electronic address: j.iwahara@utmb.edu.
Levani ZandarashviliDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Catherine A KemmeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, United States.
Alexandre EsadzeDepartment of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States.

Funding

Target DNA search by zinc-finger proteinsR01GM107590 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI IWAHARA, JUNJI · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To perform their function, transcription factors and DNA-repair/modifying enzymes must first locate their targets in the vast presence of nonspecific, but structurally similar sites on genomic DNA. Before reaching their targets, these proteins stochastically scan DNA and dynamically move from one site to another on DNA. Solution NMR spectroscopy provides unique atomic-level insights into the dynamic DNA-scanning processes, which are difficult to gain by any other experimental means. In this review, we provide an introductory overview on the NMR methods for the structural, dynamic, and kinetic investigations of target DNA search by proteins. We also discuss advantages and disadvantages of these NMR methods over other methods such as single-molecule techniques and biochemical approaches.

Indexed as

DNAHumansNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein BindingProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryDNAProteinsDNA scanningDynamicsKineticsNMRProtein-DNA interactionsTarget search

Identifiers

PMID29753002
PMCPMC6133758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.