Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29752875›Full record

ArticleYeast (Chichester, England)2018

Characterization of antagonistic yeasts for biocontrol applications on apples or in soil by quantitative analyses of synthetic yeast communities.

Simon Gross, Liesa Kunz, Denise C Müller, Amanda Santos Kron, Florian M Freimoser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yeast (Chichester, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulcherrimin and Beyond: The Multifaceted Role ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. First Report on Antifungal Activity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Use ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon GrossAgroscope, Research Division Plant Protection, Schloss 1, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Liesa KunzAgroscope, Research Division Plant Protection, Schloss 1, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Denise C MüllerAgroscope, Research Division Plant Protection, Schloss 1, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Amanda Santos KronAgroscope, Research Division Plant Protection, Schloss 1, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Florian M FreimoserAgroscope, Research Division Plant Protection, Schloss 1, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7607-3108
Agroscope · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antagonistic yeasts suppress plant pathogenic fungi by various mechanisms, but their biocontrol efficacy also depends on the ability to compete and persist in the environment. The goal of the work presented here was to quantify the composition of synthetic yeast communities in order to determine the competitiveness of different species and identify promising candidates for plant protection. For this purpose, colony counting of distinct species and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS; MALDI biotyping) were used to distinguish different yeast species and to quantify the composition of a synthetic community of six yeasts (Aureobasidium pullulans, Candida subhashii, Cyberlindnera sargentensis, Hanseniaspora sp., Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Pichia kluyveri) over time, on apples and in soil, and in different growth media. These studies revealed important characteristics that predispose the different species for particular applications. For example, the competitiveness and antagonistic activity of C. subhashii was strongly increased in the presence of N-acetylglucosamin as the sole carbon source, M. pulcherrima and A. pullulans were the strongest competitors on apple, and C. sargentensis competed the best in soil microcosms. Based on these laboratory studies, M. pulcherrima and A. pullulans are promising candidates for biocontrol applications against fungal phyllosphere diseases, while C. sargentensis may hold potential for use against soilborne fungal pathogens. These results document the potential of MALDI-TOF MS for the quantitative analysis of synthetic yeast communities and highlight the value of studying microorganisms with relevant functions in moderately complex, synthetic communities and natural substrates rather than as individual isolates.

Indexed as

AntibiosisBiological Control AgentsMicrobial ConsortiaSoil MicrobiologyCandidaCulture MediaMalusPichiaSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationYeastsBiological Control AgentsCulture Mediaantagonistinterspecific competitionMALDI-TOFmass spectrometrysynthetic communityyeast

Identifiers

PMID29752875
PMCPMC6220783
OpenAlexW2800218244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.