Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29752816›Full record

SynthesisClinical cardiology2018

Relation between age and carotid artery intima-medial thickness: a systematic review.

Inge C L van den Munckhof, Helen Jones, Maria T E Hopman, Jacqueline de Graaf, Jean Nyakayiru, Bart van Dijk, Thijs M H Eijsvogels, Dick H J Thijssen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Inge C L van den MunckhofDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Helen JonesResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Maria T E HopmanDepartment of Physiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jacqueline de GraafDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jean NyakayiruDepartment of Physiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Bart van DijkDepartment of Physiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Thijs M H EijsvogelsResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Dick H J ThijssenResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLLiverpool John Moores University · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carotid artery intima-medial thickness (cIMT) represents a popular measure of atherosclerosis and is predictive of future cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Although older age is associated with a higher cIMT, little is known about whether this increase in cIMT follows a linear relationship with age or it is affected under influence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) or CVD risk factors. We hypothesize that the relationship between cIMT and age is nonlinear and is affected by CVD or risk factors. A systematic review of studies that examined cIMT in the general population and human populations free from CVD/risk factors was undertaken. The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Seventeen studies with 32 unique study populations, involving 10,124 healthy individuals free from CVD risk factors, were included. Furthermore, 58 studies with 115 unique study populations were included, involving 65,774 individuals from the general population (with and without CVD risk factors). A strong positive association was evident between age and cIMT in the healthy population, demonstrating a gradual, linear increase in cIMT that did not differ between age decades (r = 0.91, P < 0.001). Although populations with individuals with CVD demonstrated a higher cIMT compared to populations free of CVD, a linear relation between age and cIMT was also present in this population. Our data suggest that cIMT is strongly and linearly related to age. This linear relationship was not affected by CVD or risk factors.

Indexed as

Carotid Intima-Media ThicknessAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCarotid Artery DiseasesHumansLinear ModelsMiddle AgedNonlinear DynamicsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk FactorsYoung AdultAgingAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseaseCardiovascular RiskWall Thickness

Identifiers

PMID29752816
PMCPMC6489962
OpenAlexW2802582783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.