ReviewAmbio2019
Reconciling farming and wild nature: Integrating human-wildlife coexistence into the land-sharing and land-sparing framework.
Review in Ambio, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- From wilderness to cohabitation: Literature review on human presence in environmental ethics.Ambio · 2026Review
- Multiscale Resource Selection for a Reintroduced Elk Population.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Farmer perceptions of the vulnerabilities of traditional livestock farming systems under global change.Ambio · 2025Article
- Ecosystem health appears neglected in the management of the human-macaque interface: A systematic review.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- Article
- How effective are interventions to reduce attacks on people from large carnivores? A systematic review protocol.Environmental evidence · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Winners and losers of land use change: A systematic review of interactions between the world's crane species (Ecology and evolution · 2022Review
- Stable isotopes reveal seasonal dietary responses to agroforestry in a venomous mammal, the Hispaniolan solenodon (Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Attitudes and preferences of wildlife and their relationship with childhood nature experience amongst residents in a tropical urban city.Urban ecosystems · 2022Article
- Review
- Avoiding negativity bias: Towards a positive psychology of human-wildlife relationships.Ambio · 2021Article
- Review
- Identifying priority core habitats and corridors for effective conservation of brown bears in Iran.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Safeguarding our future by protecting biodiversity.Plant diversity · 2020Article
- Effects of human-induced prey depletion on large carnivores in protected areas: Lessons from modeling tiger populations in stylized spatial scenarios.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Land has traditionally been spared to protect biodiversity; however, this approach has not succeeded by itself and requires a complementary strategy in human-dominated landscapes: land-sharing. Human-wildlife conflicts are rampant in a land-sharing context where wildlife co-occur with crops or livestock, but whose resulting interactions adversely affect the wellbeing of land owners, ultimately impeding coexistence. Therefore, true land-sharing only works if coexistence is also considered an end goal. We reviewed the literature on land-sharing and found that conflicts have not yet found their way into the land-sharing/sparing framework, with wildlife and humans co-occurring without coexisting in a dynamic process. To successfully implement a land-sharing approach, we must first acknowledge our failure to integrate the body of work on human-wildlife conflicts into the framework and work to implement multidisciplinary approaches from the ecological, economic, and sociological sciences to overcome and prevent conflicts. We suggest the use of Conflict Transformation by means of the Levels of Conflict Model to perceive both visible and deep-rooted causes of conflicts as opportunities to create problem-solving dynamics in affected socio-ecological landscapes. Reconciling farming and nature is possible by aiming for a transition to landscapes that truly share space by virtue of coexistence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.